Utilizing large language models to construct a dataset of Württemberg’s 19th-century fauna from historical records

Constructing datasets on past biodiversity from historical sources is crucial for understanding long-term ecological changes. Typically, compiling such datasets relies on prior knowledge of the sources' composition and requires considerable manual effort. To overcome these challenges, we implement an automated approach based on prompted large language models (LLMs) to detect mentions of species in texts from 19th-century Württemberg and link these mentions to identifiers in the GBIF database. Based on our evaluation, we find that LLMs can reliably identify species in the texts with high recall (92.6%) and precision (95.3%), while providing estimates of the correct species identifier with considerable accuracy (83.0%). As our approach is easily scalable and adaptable to other contexts and languages, it offers a promising way to advance dataset generation from historical material using limited resources.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344181
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilizing large language models to construct a dataset of Württemberg’s 19th-century fauna from historical records

PLoS ONE
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Utilizing large language models to construct a dataset of Württemberg’s 19th-century fauna from historical records

article en

Abstract

Constructing datasets on past biodiversity from historical sources is crucial for understanding long-term ecological changes. Typically, compiling such datasets relies on prior knowledge of the sources' composition and requires considerable manual effort. To overcome these challenges, we implement an automated approach based on prompted large language models (LLMs) to detect mentions of species in texts from 19th-century Württemberg and link these mentions to identifiers in the GBIF database. Based on our evaluation, we find that LLMs can reliably identify species in the texts with high recall (92.6%) and precision (95.3%), while providing estimates of the correct species identifier with considerable accuracy (83.0%). As our approach is easily scalable and adaptable to other contexts and languages, it offers a promising way to advance dataset generation from historical material using limited resources.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
University of Passau (DE), Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Utilizing large language models to construct a dataset of Württemberg’s 19th-century fauna from historical records · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS