A case study of using Project Management Maturity Models to assess Project Management Practices and define future improvements in R&D&I centers

Research, Development, and Innovation (R&D&I) centers play a pivotal role in bridging academia and industry, often operating in high-uncertainty environments with diverse stakeholders. Despite their innovation-driven missions, these R&D&I centers face recurring challenges in project management and execution. Literature suggests that project management maturity is closely linked to project success. This research addresses whether assessing project management maturity can provide actionable insights and guide improvement strategies. A single-case study was conducted at a multidisciplinary R&D&I center based in Portugal. A three-phase use case methodology was applied: (1) selecting a maturity model and diagnostic tools, (2) collecting data through document analysis, a 40-question structured questionnaire (n=17), and semi-structured interviews (n=5), and (3) analyzing results and defining an improvement plan for project management processes. The (PM)² Maturity Model was used to assess five dimensions of project management maturity. Findings placed the center at Maturity Level 3 (Institutionalized Process), with strengths in project awareness and training process, but weaknesses in tool usage, documentation, risk analysis, and governance. Interviews validated these findings and highlighted improvement opportunities. This single-case study supports the use of maturity models as effective roadmaps for enhancing project management in R&D&I environments and offers guidance for implementing structured improvement strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.198
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A case study of using Project Management Maturity Models to assess Project Management Practices and define future improvements in R&D&I centers

Alberto M. Pereira, José Salgado Rodrigues, G Felgueiras e Sousa
Procedia Computer Science
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

A case study of using Project Management Maturity Models to assess Project Management Practices and define future improvements in R&D&I centers

Alberto M. Pereira, José Salgado Rodrigues, G Felgueiras e Sousa
article en

Abstract

Research, Development, and Innovation (R&D&I) centers play a pivotal role in bridging academia and industry, often operating in high-uncertainty environments with diverse stakeholders. Despite their innovation-driven missions, these R&D&I centers face recurring challenges in project management and execution. Literature suggests that project management maturity is closely linked to project success. This research addresses whether assessing project management maturity can provide actionable insights and guide improvement strategies. A single-case study was conducted at a multidisciplinary R&D&I center based in Portugal. A three-phase use case methodology was applied: (1) selecting a maturity model and diagnostic tools, (2) collecting data through document analysis, a 40-question structured questionnaire (n=17), and semi-structured interviews (n=5), and (3) analyzing results and defining an improvement plan for project management processes. The (PM)² Maturity Model was used to assess five dimensions of project management maturity. Findings placed the center at Maturity Level 3 (Institutionalized Process), with strengths in project awareness and training process, but weaknesses in tool usage, documentation, risk analysis, and governance. Interviews validated these findings and highlighted improvement opportunities. This single-case study supports the use of maturity models as effective roadmaps for enhancing project management in R&D&I environments and offers guidance for implementing structured improvement strategies.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 278
Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A case study of using Project Management Maturity Models to assess Project Management Practices and define future improvements in R&D&I centers — Alberto M. Pereira, José Salgado Rodrigues, et al. · Procedia Computer Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS