Top box vs. brand selection vs. yes/no: Survey options for purchase intentions that are highly predictive of purchase behavior

The effectiveness of the method of presenting options in a purchase intention survey, essential for demand forecasting, is examined in four industries in Japan: tea, beer, cafes, and restaurants. To improve the prediction accuracy of actual purchasing behavior, brand selection should be adopted with a top-box or single-answer approach. These methods present a high psychological barrier to positively expressing purchase intention in the survey. However, to comprehensively identify people who will actually purchase, a yes/no question should be adopted. This is because, as a two-choice question, researchers can confirm the intention to purchase multiple brands without giving ambiguous answers, as with the top-2-box or multiple answers. Moreover, because the psychological barrier is not as high as that with a top-box or single answer, there is less chance of missing out on buyers. Practitioners must design options for purchase intention questions based on their market research purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.010
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Top box vs. brand selection vs. yes/no: Survey options for purchase intentions that are highly predictive of purchase behavior

Takahiko Umeyama, Ryo Kobayashi, Takumi Kato, Shinya Minegishi
Procedia Computer Science
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
article

Top box vs. brand selection vs. yes/no: Survey options for purchase intentions that are highly predictive of purchase behavior

Takahiko Umeyama, Ryo Kobayashi, Takumi Kato, Shinya Minegishi
article en

Abstract

The effectiveness of the method of presenting options in a purchase intention survey, essential for demand forecasting, is examined in four industries in Japan: tea, beer, cafes, and restaurants. To improve the prediction accuracy of actual purchasing behavior, brand selection should be adopted with a top-box or single-answer approach. These methods present a high psychological barrier to positively expressing purchase intention in the survey. However, to comprehensively identify people who will actually purchase, a yes/no question should be adopted. This is because, as a two-choice question, researchers can confirm the intention to purchase multiple brands without giving ambiguous answers, as with the top-2-box or multiple answers. Moreover, because the psychological barrier is not as high as that with a top-box or single answer, there is less chance of missing out on buyers. Practitioners must design options for purchase intention questions based on their market research purpose.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 278
Tokyo Medical University (JP), Meiji University (JP)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Top box vs. brand selection vs. yes/no: Survey options for purchase intentions that are highly predictive of purchase behavior — Takahiko Umeyama, Ryo Kobayashi, et al. · Procedia Computer Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS