Deep learning–based quantitative CT assessment of interstitial lung abnormalities: prognostic risk thresholds in a health screening population

Quantitative risk thresholds for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and their association with long-term outcomes remain unclear in health screening populations. In this retrospective study, individuals aged ≥ 50 years who underwent chest CT between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. Baseline CT scans were independently reviewed by two chest radiologists and categorized as none, equivocal ILA, or ILA, with consensus adjudication. ILA extent was quantified using a deep learning–based approach, including total ILA% and fibrotic ILA% across the whole lung. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between ILA extent and clinical outcomes, including interstitial lung disease diagnosis, lung cancer diagnosis, and all-cause mortality. Optimal thresholds were determined using the minimum P-value method. Among 3,363 participants, 73 (2.2%) had ILA and 124 (3.7%) had equivocal ILA. The optimal cutoffs for all-cause mortality were 2.89% for total ILA and 0.26% for fibrotic ILA. Participants with total ILA ≥ 2.89% (HR, 5.15; P < 0.001) or fibrotic ILA ≥ 0.26% (HR, 2.71; P < 0.001) had significantly higher mortality risks compared with those below these thresholds. Deep learning–based quantitative ILA assessment was independently associated with long-term mortality, with prognostic thresholds of 3% for total ILA and 0.3% for fibrotic ILA in a health screening population.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45108-w
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning–based quantitative CT assessment of interstitial lung abnormalities: prognostic risk thresholds in a health screening population

Scientific Reports
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
article

Deep learning–based quantitative CT assessment of interstitial lung abnormalities: prognostic risk thresholds in a health screening population

article en

Abstract

Quantitative risk thresholds for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and their association with long-term outcomes remain unclear in health screening populations. In this retrospective study, individuals aged ≥ 50 years who underwent chest CT between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. Baseline CT scans were independently reviewed by two chest radiologists and categorized as none, equivocal ILA, or ILA, with consensus adjudication. ILA extent was quantified using a deep learning–based approach, including total ILA% and fibrotic ILA% across the whole lung. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between ILA extent and clinical outcomes, including interstitial lung disease diagnosis, lung cancer diagnosis, and all-cause mortality. Optimal thresholds were determined using the minimum P-value method. Among 3,363 participants, 73 (2.2%) had ILA and 124 (3.7%) had equivocal ILA. The optimal cutoffs for all-cause mortality were 2.89% for total ILA and 0.26% for fibrotic ILA. Participants with total ILA ≥ 2.89% (HR, 5.15; P < 0.001) or fibrotic ILA ≥ 0.26% (HR, 2.71; P < 0.001) had significantly higher mortality risks compared with those below these thresholds. Deep learning–based quantitative ILA assessment was independently associated with long-term mortality, with prognostic thresholds of 3% for total ILA and 0.3% for fibrotic ILA in a health screening population.

Scientific Reports
Ulsan College (KR), Inha University (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Chonnam National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.