Strengthening Self-Efficacy in the Graduate Application Process: Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Despite an increase in graduate school enrollment for students with marginalized identities, disparities in graduate school entrance persist, particularly for first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented students of color. Although pilot research has offered preliminary support for interventions designed to assist students in the postgraduate application process, rigorous research allowing for causal inference remains limited. Using a randomized control design, this study sought to extend pilot research on one such graduate school application intervention, Bridging the Graduate Application Process (GAP) , through assessing its effectiveness compared to an attention control (AC) condition and waitlist control (WLC) condition. A total of 188 participants recruited from Midwestern universities completed baseline assessments and were included in an intent-to-treat analysis using a linear mixed-effects model to assess changes in postgraduate school application self-efficacy scores across the three intervention conditions at pretest and posttest. A per protocol analysis was also conducted to determine the efficacy of the intervention using participants who completed the condition originally allocated. Results suggest statistically significant improvements in application self-efficacy in the experimental group compared to both the AC and WLC conditions. These findings provide robust support for GAP as a promising intervention to increase sociocognitive resources and promote equity in the graduate application process.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Career Assessment
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261437110
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening Self-Efficacy in the Graduate Application Process: Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of Career Assessment
Career Development and Diversity
article

Strengthening Self-Efficacy in the Graduate Application Process: Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial

article en

Abstract

Despite an increase in graduate school enrollment for students with marginalized identities, disparities in graduate school entrance persist, particularly for first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented students of color. Although pilot research has offered preliminary support for interventions designed to assist students in the postgraduate application process, rigorous research allowing for causal inference remains limited. Using a randomized control design, this study sought to extend pilot research on one such graduate school application intervention, Bridging the Graduate Application Process (GAP) , through assessing its effectiveness compared to an attention control (AC) condition and waitlist control (WLC) condition. A total of 188 participants recruited from Midwestern universities completed baseline assessments and were included in an intent-to-treat analysis using a linear mixed-effects model to assess changes in postgraduate school application self-efficacy scores across the three intervention conditions at pretest and posttest. A per protocol analysis was also conducted to determine the efficacy of the intervention using participants who completed the condition originally allocated. Results suggest statistically significant improvements in application self-efficacy in the experimental group compared to both the AC and WLC conditions. These findings provide robust support for GAP as a promising intervention to increase sociocognitive resources and promote equity in the graduate application process.

Journal of Career Assessment
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.