Do the Core Concerns of Climate Adaptation Policies and Studies Align?—A Comparative Review of Policy Documents and the Literature

A comparative review of the alignment between climate adaptation policies and studies helps identify and narrow their gaps, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of climate adaptation actions in the human settlements. This study systematically traced the development of policies and studies to reveal the evolution of their interactions. An analytical framework for assessing alignment was constructed across four dimensions—level of attention, adaptation target, adaptation action, and adaptation scale—to evaluate the alignment within core concerns. The results indicate that climate adaptation policies have embraced global coordination, while studies have gradually shifted from a theoretical focus to applied practice. The policy–research relationship has evolved from study-led development through parallel advancement to bidirectional interaction, though the efficiency and depth of their synergy remain limited. Across core concerns, overall alignment was relatively strong. Higher alignment was observed in cities and built environments, climate risk and disaster management, and water resource management; coastal areas and health and well-being showed moderate alignment; and ecosystems and biodiversity exhibited relatively low alignment. Alignment is generally strong in terms of adaptation target and action, but weak in regard to adaptation scale, with future scenario simulations and studies at regional and community scales remaining insufficient. Future studies should move beyond “outcome alignment” to “mechanism alignment” by optimizing policy–research bidirectional feedback mechanisms, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and exchange mechanisms, and enhancing coordinated support through resource allocation and governance mechanisms. These findings contribute to the climate adaptation governance theory and provide insights and guidance for the future development of both policies and studies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape Architecture Frontiers
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15302/j-laf-2026-0015
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do the Core Concerns of Climate Adaptation Policies and Studies Align?—A Comparative Review of Policy Documents and the Literature

Landscape Architecture Frontiers
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Do the Core Concerns of Climate Adaptation Policies and Studies Align?—A Comparative Review of Policy Documents and the Literature

article en

Abstract

A comparative review of the alignment between climate adaptation policies and studies helps identify and narrow their gaps, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of climate adaptation actions in the human settlements. This study systematically traced the development of policies and studies to reveal the evolution of their interactions. An analytical framework for assessing alignment was constructed across four dimensions—level of attention, adaptation target, adaptation action, and adaptation scale—to evaluate the alignment within core concerns. The results indicate that climate adaptation policies have embraced global coordination, while studies have gradually shifted from a theoretical focus to applied practice. The policy–research relationship has evolved from study-led development through parallel advancement to bidirectional interaction, though the efficiency and depth of their synergy remain limited. Across core concerns, overall alignment was relatively strong. Higher alignment was observed in cities and built environments, climate risk and disaster management, and water resource management; coastal areas and health and well-being showed moderate alignment; and ecosystems and biodiversity exhibited relatively low alignment. Alignment is generally strong in terms of adaptation target and action, but weak in regard to adaptation scale, with future scenario simulations and studies at regional and community scales remaining insufficient. Future studies should move beyond “outcome alignment” to “mechanism alignment” by optimizing policy–research bidirectional feedback mechanisms, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and exchange mechanisms, and enhancing coordinated support through resource allocation and governance mechanisms. These findings contribute to the climate adaptation governance theory and provide insights and guidance for the future development of both policies and studies.

Landscape Architecture FrontiersVol. 14(2)
Sichuan University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do the Core Concerns of Climate Adaptation Policies and Studies Align?—A Comparative Review of Policy Documents and the Literature · Landscape Architecture Frontiers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS