AI content labeling and user engagement on social media: The role of AI level, content type, and disclosure timing

Abstract The rapid adoption of generative AI by content creators, coupled with the emergence of legal requirements for labeling AI-generated content, raises important questions about the implications of AI on user engagement on social media platforms. We examine how the level of AI involvement (human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated), content type (emotional or rational), and disclosure timing (early or late) impact user engagement through two online experiments (study 1: n = 325; study 2: n = 371) conducted via the crowdsourcing platform Prolific. Participants (mean age = 35 years; 55% female) were asked to view Instagram profiles containing visual content labeled as human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated. The results show that labeling content as AI-generated or AI-enhanced reduced both affective and behavioral engagement compared to human-created content, particularly for emotional content. Late disclosure of AI involvement improved affective engagement for AI-enhanced content, but not for AI-generated content. These findings deepen the understanding of algorithmic aversion in the context of generative AI and offer practical guidance for creators and platforms navigating the tension between transparency and engagement in an increasingly AI-mediated content ecosystem.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Markets
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-026-00883-2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI content labeling and user engagement on social media: The role of AI level, content type, and disclosure timing

Electronic Markets
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI content labeling and user engagement on social media: The role of AI level, content type, and disclosure timing

article en

Abstract

Abstract The rapid adoption of generative AI by content creators, coupled with the emergence of legal requirements for labeling AI-generated content, raises important questions about the implications of AI on user engagement on social media platforms. We examine how the level of AI involvement (human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated), content type (emotional or rational), and disclosure timing (early or late) impact user engagement through two online experiments (study 1: n = 325; study 2: n = 371) conducted via the crowdsourcing platform Prolific. Participants (mean age = 35 years; 55% female) were asked to view Instagram profiles containing visual content labeled as human-created, AI-enhanced, or AI-generated. The results show that labeling content as AI-generated or AI-enhanced reduced both affective and behavioral engagement compared to human-created content, particularly for emotional content. Late disclosure of AI involvement improved affective engagement for AI-enhanced content, but not for AI-generated content. These findings deepen the understanding of algorithmic aversion in the context of generative AI and offer practical guidance for creators and platforms navigating the tension between transparency and engagement in an increasingly AI-mediated content ecosystem.

Electronic MarketsVol. 36(1)
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.