A new tooth size determination method based on the maxillary canine using facial proportions as a reference: the Abay ratio — a retrospective study

Accurate estimation of tooth size is essential for achieving esthetic and functional harmony in orthodontic and restorative treatments. However, traditional analyses like Bolton's do not account for facial proportions, limiting individualized planning. This study investigates the relationship between tooth dimensions and facial measurements-including orbital, nasal, maxillary, and intermolar widths-in the Turkish population, aiming to support clinicians in achieving optimal esthetic outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted using dental scans and radiographs of orthodontic patients treated at Ordu University between January 2018 and July 2024. Inclusion criteria required healthy teeth with no restorations, caries, or anomalies, and a balanced facial appearance without prior orthodontic treatment. Digital intraoral scans were performed with the 3Shape TRIOS 3 scanner, and measurements were analyzed using Orthoanalyzer software. Cephalometric and anteroposterior radiographs assessed facial proportions. Statistical analyses, including One-Way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation tests, were performed using NCSS 2007 software, with significance set at p < 0.01. Data from 304 subjects (136 males, 168 females, mean age 18.31 years) were analyzed. Measurements included mandibular width, maxillary width, facial width, intermolar distance, and nasal width. No significant difference in tooth dimensions was found across skeletal classes in males, but trends suggested complex relationships between facial proportions and tooth dimensions. This study enhances understanding of dental-facial relationships in the Turkish population. While facial proportions may influence tooth dimensions, the effects are not uniform across skeletal classifications. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing orthodontic and restorative treatments for improved aesthetic outcomes. The findings of this study highlight that the Abay Ratio provides a simple, reliable, and clinically applicable guideline for determining ideal tooth proportions in harmony with facial dimensions. This novel ratio provides clinicians with a fast and practical system that can be easily applied in daily clinical practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Saudi Dental Journal
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-026-00123-5
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new tooth size determination method based on the maxillary canine using facial proportions as a reference: the Abay ratio — a retrospective study

The Saudi Dental Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

A new tooth size determination method based on the maxillary canine using facial proportions as a reference: the Abay ratio — a retrospective study

article en

Abstract

Accurate estimation of tooth size is essential for achieving esthetic and functional harmony in orthodontic and restorative treatments. However, traditional analyses like Bolton's do not account for facial proportions, limiting individualized planning. This study investigates the relationship between tooth dimensions and facial measurements-including orbital, nasal, maxillary, and intermolar widths-in the Turkish population, aiming to support clinicians in achieving optimal esthetic outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted using dental scans and radiographs of orthodontic patients treated at Ordu University between January 2018 and July 2024. Inclusion criteria required healthy teeth with no restorations, caries, or anomalies, and a balanced facial appearance without prior orthodontic treatment. Digital intraoral scans were performed with the 3Shape TRIOS 3 scanner, and measurements were analyzed using Orthoanalyzer software. Cephalometric and anteroposterior radiographs assessed facial proportions. Statistical analyses, including One-Way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation tests, were performed using NCSS 2007 software, with significance set at p < 0.01. Data from 304 subjects (136 males, 168 females, mean age 18.31 years) were analyzed. Measurements included mandibular width, maxillary width, facial width, intermolar distance, and nasal width. No significant difference in tooth dimensions was found across skeletal classes in males, but trends suggested complex relationships between facial proportions and tooth dimensions. This study enhances understanding of dental-facial relationships in the Turkish population. While facial proportions may influence tooth dimensions, the effects are not uniform across skeletal classifications. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing orthodontic and restorative treatments for improved aesthetic outcomes. The findings of this study highlight that the Abay Ratio provides a simple, reliable, and clinically applicable guideline for determining ideal tooth proportions in harmony with facial dimensions. This novel ratio provides clinicians with a fast and practical system that can be easily applied in daily clinical practice.

The Saudi Dental JournalVol. 38(4)
Ordu University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A new tooth size determination method based on the maxillary canine using facial proportions as a reference: the Abay ratio — a retrospective study · The Saudi Dental Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS