Impact of Leadership Structures on Sterile Processing Performance and Patient Safety

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Sterile processing departments (SPDs) are foundational to perioperative safety and play a critical role in preventing surgical-site infections and ensuring procedural reliability. Despite this essential function, SPD professionals often report limited organizational visibility and constrained decision-making authority. Many also experience insufficient integration into formal governance structures. Empirical literature examining the relationship among reporting structures, professional autonomy, and patient safety outcomes in SPDs remains limited. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A convergent mixed-methods design was used in this study. A structured survey of 89 SPD professionals was conducted to quantify perceptions of reporting relationships, leadership support, and adherence to sterilization protocols. Open-ended responses were also collected to capture qualitative insights. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were examined through inductive thematic coding to identify recurring organizational and cultural factors influencing professional autonomy and operational performance. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most respondents reported administratively reporting to nursing or supply chain leadership. Participants generally expressed low to moderate confidence in leadership's understanding of SPD workflows. In addition, 43% of respondents reported experiencing pressure to circumvent established sterilization protocols. Qualitative analysis identified 13 dominant themes. Key themes included the need for greater professional autonomy, formal leadership development, stronger interdisciplinary alignment, standardized credentialing, and improved professional recognition. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The findings suggested that current governance structures may limit SPD operational authority and introduce potential risks to patient safety. Organizational restructuring may help strengthen SPD leadership and decision-making capacity. Establishing formal credentialing standards and leadership development pathways may also be beneficial. Greater integration of SPD leadership into executive decision-making processes could improve compliance with sterilization standards and support higher-quality perioperative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-60.1.1
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Leadership Structures on Sterile Processing Performance and Patient Safety

Keith Bush, Brandon M Gantt
Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Impact of Leadership Structures on Sterile Processing Performance and Patient Safety

Keith Bush, Brandon M Gantt
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Sterile processing departments (SPDs) are foundational to perioperative safety and play a critical role in preventing surgical-site infections and ensuring procedural reliability. Despite this essential function, SPD professionals often report limited organizational visibility and constrained decision-making authority. Many also experience insufficient integration into formal governance structures. Empirical literature examining the relationship among reporting structures, professional autonomy, and patient safety outcomes in SPDs remains limited. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A convergent mixed-methods design was used in this study. A structured survey of 89 SPD professionals was conducted to quantify perceptions of reporting relationships, leadership support, and adherence to sterilization protocols. Open-ended responses were also collected to capture qualitative insights. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were examined through inductive thematic coding to identify recurring organizational and cultural factors influencing professional autonomy and operational performance. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most respondents reported administratively reporting to nursing or supply chain leadership. Participants generally expressed low to moderate confidence in leadership's understanding of SPD workflows. In addition, 43% of respondents reported experiencing pressure to circumvent established sterilization protocols. Qualitative analysis identified 13 dominant themes. Key themes included the need for greater professional autonomy, formal leadership development, stronger interdisciplinary alignment, standardized credentialing, and improved professional recognition. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The findings suggested that current governance structures may limit SPD operational authority and introduce potential risks to patient safety. Organizational restructuring may help strengthen SPD leadership and decision-making capacity. Establishing formal credentialing standards and leadership development pathways may also be beneficial. Greater integration of SPD leadership into executive decision-making processes could improve compliance with sterilization standards and support higher-quality perioperative outcomes.

Biomedical Instrumentation & TechnologyVol. 60(1)
Christiana Care Health System (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.