Humanoid futures without lock-in: A design-driven framework for morphology, infrastructure, and policy

While humanoid robots are increasingly framed as the “natural” solution for human-scale environments (from factories to public spaces) this immediate “fit” carries the risk of a long-term “morphological lock-in.” This article argues that prioritizing human resemblance in robotics is not merely a technical choice but a socio-technical commitment that may prematurely foreclose alternative, and potentially more efficient, robotic forms. By synthesizing scholarship on path dependence with recent signals from the 2024–2025 industrial deployment wave, we identify three stabilizing mechanisms such as infrastructural compatibility, social familiarity, and narrowing engineering horizons. To counteract this tendency, we propose a three-level transition framework: (1) Design Research that decouples “fitness for task” from “human likeness” to generate morphological diversity; (2) Experimental Infrastructures that serve as incubation environments for non-humanoid forms; and (3) Anticipatory Governance that shifts standards from prescribing form to evaluating performance outcomes. This study contributes a design-driven roadmap to ensure that the future of robotics is not limited to a single archetype but remains open to a pluralism of bodies optimized for diverse functions.

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102680
Primary Topic
Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humanoid futures without lock-in: A design-driven framework for morphology, infrastructure, and policy

Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
article

Humanoid futures without lock-in: A design-driven framework for morphology, infrastructure, and policy

article en

Abstract

While humanoid robots are increasingly framed as the “natural” solution for human-scale environments (from factories to public spaces) this immediate “fit” carries the risk of a long-term “morphological lock-in.” This article argues that prioritizing human resemblance in robotics is not merely a technical choice but a socio-technical commitment that may prematurely foreclose alternative, and potentially more efficient, robotic forms. By synthesizing scholarship on path dependence with recent signals from the 2024–2025 industrial deployment wave, we identify three stabilizing mechanisms such as infrastructural compatibility, social familiarity, and narrowing engineering horizons. To counteract this tendency, we propose a three-level transition framework: (1) Design Research that decouples “fitness for task” from “human likeness” to generate morphological diversity; (2) Experimental Infrastructures that serve as incubation environments for non-humanoid forms; and (3) Anticipatory Governance that shifts standards from prescribing form to evaluating performance outcomes. This study contributes a design-driven roadmap to ensure that the future of robotics is not limited to a single archetype but remains open to a pluralism of bodies optimized for diverse functions.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.