Biomechanical index for predicting the risk of acute coronary syndrome

Background A patient-specific biomechanical model for quantifying the stress state within coronary atherosclerotic lesions for the noninvasive prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been established. Methods Sixty-nine patients with clearly documented ACS and available coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA) acquired between 1 month and 2 years before the development of ACS were included. In 63 culprit and 146 nonculprit lesions, lumen geometry, the presence of adverse plaque characteristics (APC), and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated using previously described methods. A novel biomechanical metric, denoted as the Cap Vulnerability Index (CVI), was calculated from cCTA data using computational solid and fluid mechanics and compared to anatomic, plaque and hemodynamics variables for the ability to discriminate culprit from nonculprit lesions. Results Culprit lesions had a greater diameter stenosis, lesion length, more adverse plaque and hemodynamic characteristics and a greater CVI. Among all parameters evaluated, CVI had the highest AUC (0.75), was the strongest independent predictor for ACS and was comparable to previously described statistical models combining anatomy, plaque and hemodynamic variables. Conclusions Noninvasive biomechanical assessment of coronary plaques using computational solid and fluid mechanics may improve identification of culprit lesions for ACS and simplify the interpretation of risk factors for individual lesions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1766059
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical index for predicting the risk of acute coronary syndrome

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Biomechanical index for predicting the risk of acute coronary syndrome

article en

Abstract

Background A patient-specific biomechanical model for quantifying the stress state within coronary atherosclerotic lesions for the noninvasive prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been established. Methods Sixty-nine patients with clearly documented ACS and available coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA) acquired between 1 month and 2 years before the development of ACS were included. In 63 culprit and 146 nonculprit lesions, lumen geometry, the presence of adverse plaque characteristics (APC), and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated using previously described methods. A novel biomechanical metric, denoted as the Cap Vulnerability Index (CVI), was calculated from cCTA data using computational solid and fluid mechanics and compared to anatomic, plaque and hemodynamics variables for the ability to discriminate culprit from nonculprit lesions. Results Culprit lesions had a greater diameter stenosis, lesion length, more adverse plaque and hemodynamic characteristics and a greater CVI. Among all parameters evaluated, CVI had the highest AUC (0.75), was the strongest independent predictor for ACS and was comparable to previously described statistical models combining anatomy, plaque and hemodynamic variables. Conclusions Noninvasive biomechanical assessment of coronary plaques using computational solid and fluid mechanics may improve identification of culprit lesions for ACS and simplify the interpretation of risk factors for individual lesions.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Molecular Medicine Research Institute (US), HeartFlow (United States) (US), Texas Research Institute (US), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.