Gender similarity effects in human–AI interaction: Development and validation of the Behavioral AI Anthropomorphism Scale (BAAS) and implications for trust and gender attribution

As conversational artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, users routinely apply human social norms to chatbot-based systems. Yet most existing instruments capture anthropomorphism as self-reported attributions or perceptions of human-likeness, whereas enacted interactional behaviors in dialogue remain undermeasured. Across a large and diverse English sample ( N = 933), we introduce and validate the Behavioral AI Anthropomorphism Scale (BAAS), the first behavioral self-report instrument assessing enacted reciprocity and socioemotional alignment with AI chatbots. Using a random-split sample approach, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a robust two-factor structure and a hierarchical higher-order model (CFI = .966, TLI = .949, RMSEA = .079, SRMR = .044), yielding strong reliability (α = .83 - .91; ω = .85 - .92) and discriminant validity (HTMT = .85) relative to psychological anthropomorphism. Behavioral anthropomorphism emerged as a central mechanism shaping trust: it explained incremental variance beyond self-reported psychological anthropomorphism (ΔR 2 = .06–.07) and mediated associations between AI use frequency, gender attribution, and trust. Gender similarity effects further revealed that men anthropomorphized AI more when perceiving it as male, whereas women did so when perceiving it as female, with parallel patterns for trust. These findings suggest that trust in AI is more closely linked to self-reported interaction behaviors than to attribution- and perception-based anthropomorphism. By identifying behavioral anthropomorphism as a key relational process in AI chatbot interaction, this work provides a validated tool and a theoretical foundation for designing socially calibrated and user-sensitive conversational AI systems. • The BAAS captures anthropomorphism as enacted social behavior during everyday AI interaction. • The scale distinguishes behavioral anthropomorphism from psychological anthropomorphism. • Psychometric analyses support a robust two factor structure with strong reliability and validity. • Behavioral anthropomorphism predicts trust and social inferences beyond belief based measures. • Gender congruence between users and AI shapes anthropomorphizing behavior and trust formation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101003
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender similarity effects in human–AI interaction: Development and validation of the Behavioral AI Anthropomorphism Scale (BAAS) and implications for trust and gender attribution

Computers in Human Behavior Reports
AI in Service Interactions
article

Gender similarity effects in human–AI interaction: Development and validation of the Behavioral AI Anthropomorphism Scale (BAAS) and implications for trust and gender attribution

article en

Abstract

As conversational artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, users routinely apply human social norms to chatbot-based systems. Yet most existing instruments capture anthropomorphism as self-reported attributions or perceptions of human-likeness, whereas enacted interactional behaviors in dialogue remain undermeasured. Across a large and diverse English sample ( N = 933), we introduce and validate the Behavioral AI Anthropomorphism Scale (BAAS), the first behavioral self-report instrument assessing enacted reciprocity and socioemotional alignment with AI chatbots. Using a random-split sample approach, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a robust two-factor structure and a hierarchical higher-order model (CFI = .966, TLI = .949, RMSEA = .079, SRMR = .044), yielding strong reliability (α = .83 - .91; ω = .85 - .92) and discriminant validity (HTMT = .85) relative to psychological anthropomorphism. Behavioral anthropomorphism emerged as a central mechanism shaping trust: it explained incremental variance beyond self-reported psychological anthropomorphism (ΔR 2 = .06–.07) and mediated associations between AI use frequency, gender attribution, and trust. Gender similarity effects further revealed that men anthropomorphized AI more when perceiving it as male, whereas women did so when perceiving it as female, with parallel patterns for trust. These findings suggest that trust in AI is more closely linked to self-reported interaction behaviors than to attribution- and perception-based anthropomorphism. By identifying behavioral anthropomorphism as a key relational process in AI chatbot interaction, this work provides a validated tool and a theoretical foundation for designing socially calibrated and user-sensitive conversational AI systems. • The BAAS captures anthropomorphism as enacted social behavior during everyday AI interaction. • The scale distinguishes behavioral anthropomorphism from psychological anthropomorphism. • Psychometric analyses support a robust two factor structure with strong reliability and validity. • Behavioral anthropomorphism predicts trust and social inferences beyond belief based measures. • Gender congruence between users and AI shapes anthropomorphizing behavior and trust formation.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 22
Helmut Schmidt University (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.