Application of a posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures: a retrospective comparative study

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is widely used for the minimally invasive treatment of single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures. However, the conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique requires repeated imaging, resulting in increased radiation exposure and prolonged operative time. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and efficiency of a posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing for percutaneous pedicle screw placement. This single-center retrospective comparative study included 143 patients with single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures treated between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were divided into the experimental group (posture-sensing combined with blind guidewire probing, n = 67) and the control group (conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique, n = 76). Perioperative parameters, pedicle screw accuracy based on the Gertzbein–Robbins classification, radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI), and postoperative complications were compared between groups. The experimental group showed significantly shorter operation time (48.6 ± 9.2 vs. 89.4 ± 16.5 min), puncture time (7.1 ± 1.5 vs. 24.3 ± 4.8 min), fewer fluoroscopy exposures (5.6 ± 1.4 vs. 15.2 ± 3.8), and less intraoperative blood loss (51.2 ± 22.8 vs. 93.5 ± 36.2 mL) than the control group (all P < 0.001). The perfect screw placement rate (Grade A) was 85.1% in the experimental group and 84.2% in the control group (P = 0.78), and the clinically acceptable rate (Grade A + B) was 96.3% and 96.1%, respectively (P = 0.93). No significant differences were observed in radiographic restoration, VAS, ODI, or their improvement values between groups (all P > 0.05). Overall complication rates were low and comparable between groups. The posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing significantly reduces operative time, fluoroscopy exposure, and blood loss while maintaining comparable screw accuracy, radiographic outcomes, and clinical efficacy to the conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique. This method is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective alternative for percutaneous pedicle screw placement, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-06754-y
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures: a retrospective comparative study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Application of a posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures: a retrospective comparative study

article en

Abstract

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is widely used for the minimally invasive treatment of single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures. However, the conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique requires repeated imaging, resulting in increased radiation exposure and prolonged operative time. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and efficiency of a posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing for percutaneous pedicle screw placement. This single-center retrospective comparative study included 143 patients with single-level thoracolumbar compression fractures treated between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were divided into the experimental group (posture-sensing combined with blind guidewire probing, n = 67) and the control group (conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique, n = 76). Perioperative parameters, pedicle screw accuracy based on the Gertzbein–Robbins classification, radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI), and postoperative complications were compared between groups. The experimental group showed significantly shorter operation time (48.6 ± 9.2 vs. 89.4 ± 16.5 min), puncture time (7.1 ± 1.5 vs. 24.3 ± 4.8 min), fewer fluoroscopy exposures (5.6 ± 1.4 vs. 15.2 ± 3.8), and less intraoperative blood loss (51.2 ± 22.8 vs. 93.5 ± 36.2 mL) than the control group (all P < 0.001). The perfect screw placement rate (Grade A) was 85.1% in the experimental group and 84.2% in the control group (P = 0.78), and the clinically acceptable rate (Grade A + B) was 96.3% and 96.1%, respectively (P = 0.93). No significant differences were observed in radiographic restoration, VAS, ODI, or their improvement values between groups (all P > 0.05). Overall complication rates were low and comparable between groups. The posture-sensing method combined with blind guidewire probing significantly reduces operative time, fluoroscopy exposure, and blood loss while maintaining comparable screw accuracy, radiographic outcomes, and clinical efficacy to the conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique. This method is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective alternative for percutaneous pedicle screw placement, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Second Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.