Twenty-five years of brand new thinking

Over its first quarter century, Marketing Theory has transformed how we think about brands, and what we think brands are. The journal began by rescuing branding from the clutches of managerial functionalism, reimagining it as a cultural phenomenon worth serious intellectual attention. What followed was a remarkable journey: from brands as symbols to brands as systems, from cultural codes to cultural infrastructures, from messages crafted in boardrooms to meanings negotiated in algorithm-mediated platforms. Along the way, the journal became a home for scholars who refused easy answers, who saw brands as sites of labour and resistance, governance and play, power and possibility. This commentary explores that intellectual adventure, highlighting the conceptual leaps and the scholars who made them, while mapping territory for future exploration. Marketing Theory’s peculiar penchant, we suggest, lies in its restless curiosity and its refusal to let ‘brand’ mean just one thing. As branding continues to evolve, the journal’s appetite for theoretical diversity suggests it’s just getting started.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Published
2026-04-16
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty-five years of brand new thinking

Rachel Ashman, Anthony Patterson
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

Twenty-five years of brand new thinking

Rachel Ashman, Anthony Patterson
article en

Abstract

Over its first quarter century, Marketing Theory has transformed how we think about brands, and what we think brands are. The journal began by rescuing branding from the clutches of managerial functionalism, reimagining it as a cultural phenomenon worth serious intellectual attention. What followed was a remarkable journey: from brands as symbols to brands as systems, from cultural codes to cultural infrastructures, from messages crafted in boardrooms to meanings negotiated in algorithm-mediated platforms. Along the way, the journal became a home for scholars who refused easy answers, who saw brands as sites of labour and resistance, governance and play, power and possibility. This commentary explores that intellectual adventure, highlighting the conceptual leaps and the scholars who made them, while mapping territory for future exploration. Marketing Theory’s peculiar penchant, we suggest, lies in its restless curiosity and its refusal to let ‘brand’ mean just one thing. As branding continues to evolve, the journal’s appetite for theoretical diversity suggests it’s just getting started.

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Twenty-five years of brand new thinking — Rachel Ashman, Anthony Patterson · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS