The broad-lined type Ic supernova 2020lao experienced an energetic explosion with no central-engine signatures

We present infant-phase observations of the broad-line Type Ic supernova (SN Ic-BL) 2020lao, including optical spectroscopy beginning within about 48 hours of the inferred explosion epoch and extending to nearly 100 days. The explosion time was constrained by power-law fits to the rising TESS and ZTF light curves, with the first ZTF detection occurring only ∼27 hours after explosion. The optical light curves show a rapid rise that lasted for ≈8.8 days and a peak luminosity typical of SNe Ic-BL (i.e., Mr ≃ −18.5 mag). Unlike some engine-driven SN Ic-BL events, the early light curve of SN 2020lao shows no evidence of an optical afterglow or excess emission, and the absence of any detectable shock–cooling component in the TESS and ZTF data constrains the progenitor to a compact Wolf-Rayet-like star whose R★ is less than or equal to a few times the R⊙, ruling out any extended envelope. The spectra resemble those of the X-ray-flash-associated SN 2006aj but with systematically higher expansion velocities. From Arnett-type fits to the bolometric light curve and measured Fe <ns0:sc>II</ns0:sc>λ5169 line velocities, we infer a 56Ni mass of 0.23 ± 0.03 M⊙, an ejecta mass (Mej) of 3.2 ± 0.8 M⊙, and a kinetic energy (EK) of ∼(23.1 ± 12.4)×1051 erg, corresponding to a specific kinetic energy (EK/Mej) of ≈(7.2 ± 3.5)×1051 erg $ M_{\odot}^{-1} $. Spectral synthesis modeling broadly reproduces the photospheric-phase spectra of SN 2020lao and suggests EK/Mej ≈ 4.9 × 1051 erg $ M_{\odot}^{-1} $. SN 2020lao and SN 2006aj synthesized comparable amounts of 56Ni, yet SN 2020lao exhibits EK/Mej values on the order of 5–10 times larger. Published VLA and Swift/XRT non-detections reveal no afterglow emission, allowing us to place stringent limits on relativistic ejecta and dense circumstellar material. Given that SN 2020lao reaches a specific kinetic energy typical of engine-driven SNe Ic-BL, the lack of an early optical excess together with the non-detections in the radio and X-ray bands suggests that if a relativistic jet was launched, the explosion must have been viewed far off axis or the jet was choked before breakout. If there was no relativistic jet, SN 2020lao would therefore be an extreme nonrelativistic SN Ic-BL. This underscores the importance of continued infant-phase, multiwavelength monitoring of these explosions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558378/pdf
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The broad-lined type Ic supernova 2020lao experienced an energetic explosion with no central-engine signatures

A. Pastorello, G. Valerin, E. Karamehmetoglu, N. Elias-Rosa et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

The broad-lined type Ic supernova 2020lao experienced an energetic explosion with no central-engine signatures

A. Pastorello, G. Valerin, E. Karamehmetoglu, N. Elias-Rosa, C. Ashall, S. Bose, E. Y. Hsiao, J. M. DerKacy, P. Lundqvist, S. Moran, E. Pian, M. D. Stritzinger, E. A. M. Jensen, T. J. Moriya, P. Höflich, L. S. Arndt, E. Baron, P. A. Mazzali, W. B. Hoogendam, L. Galbany, M. Shahbandeh
article en

Abstract

We present infant-phase observations of the broad-line Type Ic supernova (SN Ic-BL) 2020lao, including optical spectroscopy beginning within about 48 hours of the inferred explosion epoch and extending to nearly 100 days. The explosion time was constrained by power-law fits to the rising TESS and ZTF light curves, with the first ZTF detection occurring only ∼27 hours after explosion. The optical light curves show a rapid rise that lasted for ≈8.8 days and a peak luminosity typical of SNe Ic-BL (i.e., Mr ≃ −18.5 mag). Unlike some engine-driven SN Ic-BL events, the early light curve of SN 2020lao shows no evidence of an optical afterglow or excess emission, and the absence of any detectable shock–cooling component in the TESS and ZTF data constrains the progenitor to a compact Wolf-Rayet-like star whose R★ is less than or equal to a few times the R⊙, ruling out any extended envelope. The spectra resemble those of the X-ray-flash-associated SN 2006aj but with systematically higher expansion velocities. From Arnett-type fits to the bolometric light curve and measured Fe <ns0:sc>II</ns0:sc>λ5169 line velocities, we infer a 56Ni mass of 0.23 ± 0.03 M⊙, an ejecta mass (Mej) of 3.2 ± 0.8 M⊙, and a kinetic energy (EK) of ∼(23.1 ± 12.4)×1051 erg, corresponding to a specific kinetic energy (EK/Mej) of ≈(7.2 ± 3.5)×1051 erg $ M_{\odot}^{-1} $. Spectral synthesis modeling broadly reproduces the photospheric-phase spectra of SN 2020lao and suggests EK/Mej ≈ 4.9 × 1051 erg $ M_{\odot}^{-1} $. SN 2020lao and SN 2006aj synthesized comparable amounts of 56Ni, yet SN 2020lao exhibits EK/Mej values on the order of 5–10 times larger. Published VLA and Swift/XRT non-detections reveal no afterglow emission, allowing us to place stringent limits on relativistic ejecta and dense circumstellar material. Given that SN 2020lao reaches a specific kinetic energy typical of engine-driven SNe Ic-BL, the lack of an early optical excess together with the non-detections in the radio and X-ray bands suggests that if a relativistic jet was launched, the explosion must have been viewed far off axis or the jet was choked before breakout. If there was no relativistic jet, SN 2020lao would therefore be an extreme nonrelativistic SN Ic-BL. This underscores the importance of continued infant-phase, multiwavelength monitoring of these explosions.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.