How the 2025 NIH grant terminations varied by researchers’ demographic groups

In early 2025, the NIH unexpectedly terminated 2,291 active research grants, withdrawing $2.45 billion and disrupting thousands of projects. While the economic magnitude of these cuts is known, less is understood about how they differed across researchers' demographic groups. Using an original dataset of publicly available records, we documented how cancelations varied by gender and career stage. Although cuts occurred across all regions and institution types, statistical patterns show that early-career investigators-assistant professors, postdoctoral scholars, trainees, and graduate students-were disproportionately affected, as were women. Women's projects were smaller on average, had a larger share of unspent funds at cancelation, and were more concentrated in training and transition awards. Although available data cannot determine downstream causal effects, NIH economic multipliers suggest a potentially large unrealized loss to the US research enterprise. These patterns highlight the vulnerability of early-career researchers and women to abrupt funding instability and underscore the need for sustained investment to protect the future scientific workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2527755123
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the 2025 NIH grant terminations varied by researchers’ demographic groups

Teresa K. Woodruff, Qian Huang, Diego F. M. Oliveira, Brian Uzzi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

How the 2025 NIH grant terminations varied by researchers’ demographic groups

Teresa K. Woodruff, Qian Huang, Diego F. M. Oliveira, Brian Uzzi
article en

Abstract

In early 2025, the NIH unexpectedly terminated 2,291 active research grants, withdrawing $2.45 billion and disrupting thousands of projects. While the economic magnitude of these cuts is known, less is understood about how they differed across researchers' demographic groups. Using an original dataset of publicly available records, we documented how cancelations varied by gender and career stage. Although cuts occurred across all regions and institution types, statistical patterns show that early-career investigators-assistant professors, postdoctoral scholars, trainees, and graduate students-were disproportionately affected, as were women. Women's projects were smaller on average, had a larger share of unspent funds at cancelation, and were more concentrated in training and transition awards. Although available data cannot determine downstream causal effects, NIH economic multipliers suggest a potentially large unrealized loss to the US research enterprise. These patterns highlight the vulnerability of early-career researchers and women to abrupt funding instability and underscore the need for sustained investment to protect the future scientific workforce.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(13)
University of North Dakota (US), University of Northwestern (US), Washington State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How the 2025 NIH grant terminations varied by researchers’ demographic groups — Teresa K. Woodruff, Qian Huang, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS