Perioperative risk stratification after resection of brain metastases: internal development and validation of the dominant lesion surgery score in a 20-year single-center cohort

To examine whether intracranial lesion count remains associated with survival after resection of brain metastases and to develop an internally validated perioperative risk-stratification model for early mortality in a surgically treated cohort. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults who underwent surgical resection for histologically confirmed brain metastases between 2002 and 2024. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression. The Dominant Lesion Surgery Score (DLSS) was derived from variables available during the perioperative period that were associated with early mortality and was evaluated for 6- and 12-month mortality using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Internal validation was performed with bootstrap resampling, and model performance was further assessed using calibration and decision-curve analysis. Among 189 surgically treated patients, lesion count was not the strongest variable associated with survival after multivariable adjustment, whereas extent of resection and histology-defined tumor subtype showed stronger associations within this selected cohort. DLSS demonstrated moderate discrimination for 6- and 12-month mortality, with stable optimism-corrected performance after bootstrap validation. Calibration analysis showed acceptable agreement between predicted and observed mortality. Decision-curve analysis suggested potential net benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. A DLSS cutoff of ≥ 2 identified a subgroup with higher 12-month mortality. Among surgically treated patients with brain metastases, lesion count alone may be insufficient to characterize postoperative risk. DLSS should be regarded as an exploratory internally derived model for perioperative risk stratification rather than a standalone tool for treatment selection, and external validation is required before broader clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05531-5
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative risk stratification after resection of brain metastases: internal development and validation of the dominant lesion surgery score in a 20-year single-center cohort

Hasan Ali Aydın, Emrah Keskin, Murat Kalaycı
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Perioperative risk stratification after resection of brain metastases: internal development and validation of the dominant lesion surgery score in a 20-year single-center cohort

Hasan Ali Aydın, Emrah Keskin, Murat Kalaycı
article en

Abstract

To examine whether intracranial lesion count remains associated with survival after resection of brain metastases and to develop an internally validated perioperative risk-stratification model for early mortality in a surgically treated cohort. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults who underwent surgical resection for histologically confirmed brain metastases between 2002 and 2024. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression. The Dominant Lesion Surgery Score (DLSS) was derived from variables available during the perioperative period that were associated with early mortality and was evaluated for 6- and 12-month mortality using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Internal validation was performed with bootstrap resampling, and model performance was further assessed using calibration and decision-curve analysis. Among 189 surgically treated patients, lesion count was not the strongest variable associated with survival after multivariable adjustment, whereas extent of resection and histology-defined tumor subtype showed stronger associations within this selected cohort. DLSS demonstrated moderate discrimination for 6- and 12-month mortality, with stable optimism-corrected performance after bootstrap validation. Calibration analysis showed acceptable agreement between predicted and observed mortality. Decision-curve analysis suggested potential net benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. A DLSS cutoff of ≥ 2 identified a subgroup with higher 12-month mortality. Among surgically treated patients with brain metastases, lesion count alone may be insufficient to characterize postoperative risk. DLSS should be regarded as an exploratory internally derived model for perioperative risk stratification rather than a standalone tool for treatment selection, and external validation is required before broader clinical use.

Journal of Neuro-OncologyVol. 177(2)
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.