What Counts when it Comes to Salary? A Qualitative Analysis of the Arguments Dutch Citizens Use when Distributing Salary
This study examines to what extent job evaluation systems align with public views on fair pay. Using a Participatory Value Evaluation, over 3,700 Dutch citizens distributed extra salary among various jobs and explained their choices. The arguments were compared to criteria used in job evaluation systems. The dimensions prioritized by participants, such as required education, job complexity, and working conditions, are already well represented in current formal job evaluation systems. However, participants also stressed aspects often absent from such systems, including a job’s societal contribution and labour market scarcity. While job evaluation systems remain broadly consistent with public reasoning, we recommend initiating broader public and institutional discussions on the evolving values that underpin fair compensation.
Authors
- Geertje van de Ven
- Jael Bootsma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7862-0109)
- Evelyn Finnema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-6144)
- Irene van de Glind (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1886-3901)
- Agnes Akkerman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6407-7563)
- Tom Geijsen
- Roos Mulder
- Lex Heerma van Voss
- N. Mouter
Institutions
- Royal Academy of Arts (GB)
- American Academy of Arts and Sciences (US)
- California HealthCare Foundation (US)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Incyte (United States) (US)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Compensation & Benefits Review
- Published
- 2026-03-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687261433134
- Primary Topic
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00