Experiences of Ageism Among Older Adults Registered with a Family Health Centre: A Mixed-Methods Research Study

<b>Background/Aim</b>: This study aimed to describe experiences of ageism and to explore related perceptions among older adults registered at an Education Family Health Centre (EFHC) in Türkiye. <b>Methods</b>: This mixed-methods study was conducted with 83 older adults registered with the education family health center (EFHC). In the quantitative part of the study, surveys (the Sociodemographic data form and the Ageism Survey, which evaluates the negative aspects of ageism) were administered face-to-face. In the qualitative section, four semi-structured questions about ageism were asked by phone. A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used in the quantitative component of the study, and thematic analysis in the qualitative part. <b>Results</b>: The mean age of the participants was 69.9 ± 4.8 years. According to Ageism Survey, 79.6% of participants gave a score higher than 0 and indicated that they had experienced age discrimination at least once. Eight participants completed the qualitative section, and three themes were identified: (1) Self-directed ageism, (2) Increasing health problems and social isolation with age, and (3) Ageism. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this EFHC-based sample, the majority of participants reported at least one experience of ageism. Social awareness about ageism needs to be increased. Educational interventions can be planned at the micro, meso, and macro levels to raise awareness and combat ageism. Family physicians who serve with a holistic approach can play a pivotal role in this regard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14060801
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of Ageism Among Older Adults Registered with a Family Health Centre: A Mixed-Methods Research Study

Zeliha Yelda Özer, Yusuf Kemal Arslan, Çiğdem Gereklioğlu, Çağla Okyar
Healthcare
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Experiences of Ageism Among Older Adults Registered with a Family Health Centre: A Mixed-Methods Research Study

Zeliha Yelda Özer, Yusuf Kemal Arslan, Çiğdem Gereklioğlu, Çağla Okyar
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Aim</b>: This study aimed to describe experiences of ageism and to explore related perceptions among older adults registered at an Education Family Health Centre (EFHC) in Türkiye. <b>Methods</b>: This mixed-methods study was conducted with 83 older adults registered with the education family health center (EFHC). In the quantitative part of the study, surveys (the Sociodemographic data form and the Ageism Survey, which evaluates the negative aspects of ageism) were administered face-to-face. In the qualitative section, four semi-structured questions about ageism were asked by phone. A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used in the quantitative component of the study, and thematic analysis in the qualitative part. <b>Results</b>: The mean age of the participants was 69.9 ± 4.8 years. According to Ageism Survey, 79.6% of participants gave a score higher than 0 and indicated that they had experienced age discrimination at least once. Eight participants completed the qualitative section, and three themes were identified: (1) Self-directed ageism, (2) Increasing health problems and social isolation with age, and (3) Ageism. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this EFHC-based sample, the majority of participants reported at least one experience of ageism. Social awareness about ageism needs to be increased. Educational interventions can be planned at the micro, meso, and macro levels to raise awareness and combat ageism. Family physicians who serve with a holistic approach can play a pivotal role in this regard.

HealthcareVol. 14(6)
Başkent University (TR), Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.