Large-scale implementation of sector coupling in Europe – a cross-disciplinary barrier analysis towards solution themes

Sector coupling can help cut costs and boost sustainability, offering a cost-effective solution to Europe's energy affordability challenge. However, in practice, sector coupling has not yet found large-scale implementation. By conducting a systematic review of extant literature, this paper identifies barriers to the large-scale implementation of sector coupling and proposes solution themes to realise its potential. Of the 63 barriers identified, the top recurring barriers include high initial investments and high costs relative to fossil fuels, deficient market and regulatory structures, lack of consumer engagement, and stakeholder coordination issues – demonstrating it is a complex interplay of technical, economic, regulatory, market, social, and institutional barriers hindering the implementation. Utilising an inductive analysis approach, the paper identifies 11 solution themes that necessitate coordinated action, with consideration of interdependencies across sectors, national contexts, energy carriers, and transition barriers, finally discussing future perspectives within a barrier-based pathway towards the large-scale implementation of sector coupling. The findings emphasise the intricate interdependence of sector coupling barriers, underscoring the necessity of shifting attention from barrier lists to cross-disciplinary, implementation-oriented transition pathways and phase-specific policy interventions. Whilst the European strategy towards sector coupling is mostly outlined, barriers concentrate around achieving sector coupling offering maturity, adapting sector coupling market design and regulation and pushing sector coupling market adoption at scale, indicating that the potential of sector coupling to reduce energy transition costs in the short-term appears constrained and pointing instead towards the necessity for an orchestrated multi-actor implementation pathway within the broader energy transition. • Identified 63 sector coupling implementation barriers in semi-systematic review. • Showed regulatory, market & social barriers hinder implementation beyond technology. • Synthesised barriers into 11 interdependent, cross-disciplinary solution themes. • Outlined a transition-oriented pathway from strategy to integrated energy systems. • Discussed maturity & market design as key bottlenecks – call for orchestrated action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102209
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale implementation of sector coupling in Europe – a cross-disciplinary barrier analysis towards solution themes

Erik Schlahn
Energy Strategy Reviews
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Large-scale implementation of sector coupling in Europe – a cross-disciplinary barrier analysis towards solution themes

Erik Schlahn
article en

Abstract

Sector coupling can help cut costs and boost sustainability, offering a cost-effective solution to Europe's energy affordability challenge. However, in practice, sector coupling has not yet found large-scale implementation. By conducting a systematic review of extant literature, this paper identifies barriers to the large-scale implementation of sector coupling and proposes solution themes to realise its potential. Of the 63 barriers identified, the top recurring barriers include high initial investments and high costs relative to fossil fuels, deficient market and regulatory structures, lack of consumer engagement, and stakeholder coordination issues – demonstrating it is a complex interplay of technical, economic, regulatory, market, social, and institutional barriers hindering the implementation. Utilising an inductive analysis approach, the paper identifies 11 solution themes that necessitate coordinated action, with consideration of interdependencies across sectors, national contexts, energy carriers, and transition barriers, finally discussing future perspectives within a barrier-based pathway towards the large-scale implementation of sector coupling. The findings emphasise the intricate interdependence of sector coupling barriers, underscoring the necessity of shifting attention from barrier lists to cross-disciplinary, implementation-oriented transition pathways and phase-specific policy interventions. Whilst the European strategy towards sector coupling is mostly outlined, barriers concentrate around achieving sector coupling offering maturity, adapting sector coupling market design and regulation and pushing sector coupling market adoption at scale, indicating that the potential of sector coupling to reduce energy transition costs in the short-term appears constrained and pointing instead towards the necessity for an orchestrated multi-actor implementation pathway within the broader energy transition. • Identified 63 sector coupling implementation barriers in semi-systematic review. • Showed regulatory, market & social barriers hinder implementation beyond technology. • Synthesised barriers into 11 interdependent, cross-disciplinary solution themes. • Outlined a transition-oriented pathway from strategy to integrated energy systems. • Discussed maturity & market design as key bottlenecks – call for orchestrated action.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 65
HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.