Patients With Obesity on the Acute Care Surgery Service: Improving Outcomes

Obesity is a chronic, progressive disease affecting approximately 40% of adults in the United States and now represents a defining characteristic of the emergency general surgery (EGS) population. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that obesity, particularly class III, class IV, and class V obesity, is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes following emergency surgical intervention, including higher rates of postoperative complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, increased readmissions, and higher mortality. Importantly, many adverse outcomes are not driven by operative mortality alone but by failure-to-rescue following preventable complications. This narrative review critically examines outcome data for obese EGS patients and argues that systematic adoption of bariatric surgery quality frameworks, including standardized pathways for infection prevention, VTE prophylaxis, nutrition, opioid stewardship, and post-discharge follow-up, represents a pragmatic and evidence-based strategy to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.105729
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients With Obesity on the Acute Care Surgery Service: Improving Outcomes

Sanjiv Gray, Beatrice Dieudonne
Cureus
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Patients With Obesity on the Acute Care Surgery Service: Improving Outcomes

Sanjiv Gray, Beatrice Dieudonne
article en

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic, progressive disease affecting approximately 40% of adults in the United States and now represents a defining characteristic of the emergency general surgery (EGS) population. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that obesity, particularly class III, class IV, and class V obesity, is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes following emergency surgical intervention, including higher rates of postoperative complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, increased readmissions, and higher mortality. Importantly, many adverse outcomes are not driven by operative mortality alone but by failure-to-rescue following preventable complications. This narrative review critically examines outcome data for obese EGS patients and argues that systematic adoption of bariatric surgery quality frameworks, including standardized pathways for infection prevention, VTE prophylaxis, nutrition, opioid stewardship, and post-discharge follow-up, represents a pragmatic and evidence-based strategy to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Cureus
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patients With Obesity on the Acute Care Surgery Service: Improving Outcomes — Sanjiv Gray, Beatrice Dieudonne · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS