EdTech and the Environment: A Research Program

Abstract The global EdTech market, valued at nearly USD 250 billion, generates not only revenue but substantial ecological and planetary costs that the EdTech scholarly community has insufficiently examined. This article argues that those working in and around EdTech bear a moral responsibility to move beyond (non)performative engagement with sustainable development goals toward serious, structural inquiry into the environmental impacts of EdTech. Drawing on a postdigital transdisciplinary framework, we identify key scholarly fields and approaches—Critical EdTech Studies, AI and education research, postdigital-biodigital approaches, Education for Sustainable Development, degrowth theory, ecopedagogy, and studies of unequal planetary conditions—and examine their respective contributions to understanding relationships between EdTech and the environment. We outline an open research program grounded in ontological, epistemological, ethical, political, pedagogical, positional, and community commitments that resist technological solutionism and growth-dependent development models. Rather than offering definitive answers, this paper extends an invitation to transdisciplinary collaboration, recognising that planetary challenges require planetary responses from a coalition of scholars willing to work across—and beyond—disciplinary boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postdigital Science and Education
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-026-00635-7
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EdTech and the Environment: A Research Program

Chrysi Rapanta, Jeremy Knox, Vasilis Kostakis, Kyungmee Lee et al.
Postdigital Science and Education
Digital Education and Society
article

EdTech and the Environment: A Research Program

Chrysi Rapanta, Jeremy Knox, Vasilis Kostakis, Kyungmee Lee, Sara Tolbert, Sarah Hayes, Petar Jandrić, Greg William Misiaszek
article en

Abstract

Abstract The global EdTech market, valued at nearly USD 250 billion, generates not only revenue but substantial ecological and planetary costs that the EdTech scholarly community has insufficiently examined. This article argues that those working in and around EdTech bear a moral responsibility to move beyond (non)performative engagement with sustainable development goals toward serious, structural inquiry into the environmental impacts of EdTech. Drawing on a postdigital transdisciplinary framework, we identify key scholarly fields and approaches—Critical EdTech Studies, AI and education research, postdigital-biodigital approaches, Education for Sustainable Development, degrowth theory, ecopedagogy, and studies of unequal planetary conditions—and examine their respective contributions to understanding relationships between EdTech and the environment. We outline an open research program grounded in ontological, epistemological, ethical, political, pedagogical, positional, and community commitments that resist technological solutionism and growth-dependent development models. Rather than offering definitive answers, this paper extends an invitation to transdisciplinary collaboration, recognising that planetary challenges require planetary responses from a coalition of scholars willing to work across—and beyond—disciplinary boundaries.

Postdigital Science and Education
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Seoul National University of Education (KR), University of Canterbury (NZ), Internet Society (US), Tohoku University (JP), University of Oxford (GB), University of Applied Health Sciences (HR), Monash University (AU), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Bath Spa University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.