Cultivating and embracing plurality in abductive inquiries within strategy research

Abduction offers a mode of scientific inquiry that focuses on formulating explanations for unexplained phenomena. By building a bridge between philosophy of science and strategic management research, this article offers a pluralistic view of abduction, highlighting abductive triggers as the starting point in seeking explanations and the essential role of both creative and selective abduction in formulating explanations. Additionally, this article provides practical guidance for the design, execution, and evaluation of abductive research, including the usefulness of abduction for studies not designed as abductive. We offer orienting considerations about abduction's steps and elements, illustrate with examples, and outline potential missteps. Abduction does not lend itself to a fixed template, and we aim to lower the barriers to using abduction in strategic management research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Journal
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70120
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultivating and embracing plurality in abductive inquiries within strategy research

Audra Wormald, Prithwiraj Choudhury, Mahka Moeen
Strategic Management Journal
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Cultivating and embracing plurality in abductive inquiries within strategy research

Audra Wormald, Prithwiraj Choudhury, Mahka Moeen
article en

Abstract

Abduction offers a mode of scientific inquiry that focuses on formulating explanations for unexplained phenomena. By building a bridge between philosophy of science and strategic management research, this article offers a pluralistic view of abduction, highlighting abductive triggers as the starting point in seeking explanations and the essential role of both creative and selective abduction in formulating explanations. Additionally, this article provides practical guidance for the design, execution, and evaluation of abductive research, including the usefulness of abduction for studies not designed as abductive. We offer orienting considerations about abduction's steps and elements, illustrate with examples, and outline potential missteps. Abduction does not lend itself to a fixed template, and we aim to lower the barriers to using abduction in strategic management research.

Strategic Management Journal
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Richard M. Schulze Family Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.