The Cyborg’s Responsibility. Part 2. Mechanisms and Practices for Implementing Responsibility in the Cyber-Physical World

This article is the second part of a study that, building on a prior philosophical and legal analysis of how the notion of responsibility is changing in the age of cyborgization, offers concrete institutional, technical, and legal mechanisms for making the idea of distributed responsibility intelligible and actionable as cyborg-related technologies develop. The paper examines legal gaps and practical barriers that hinder a fair assessment of individual actors’ contributions within hybrid systems. To address these problems, the author proposes several regulatory models, including insurance-based, licensing, and corporate, that appear promising under the new conditions. The study concludes that the era of cyborgization calls for a systemic architecture in which technical transparency, institutional accountability, and expert support operate together to satisfy the unique demands created by hybridity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Societies
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207751800037341-4
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cyborg’s Responsibility. Part 2. Mechanisms and Practices for Implementing Responsibility in the Cyber-Physical World

Oleg Gurov
Artificial Societies
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

The Cyborg’s Responsibility. Part 2. Mechanisms and Practices for Implementing Responsibility in the Cyber-Physical World

Oleg Gurov
article en

Abstract

This article is the second part of a study that, building on a prior philosophical and legal analysis of how the notion of responsibility is changing in the age of cyborgization, offers concrete institutional, technical, and legal mechanisms for making the idea of distributed responsibility intelligible and actionable as cyborg-related technologies develop. The paper examines legal gaps and practical barriers that hinder a fair assessment of individual actors’ contributions within hybrid systems. To address these problems, the author proposes several regulatory models, including insurance-based, licensing, and corporate, that appear promising under the new conditions. The study concludes that the era of cyborgization calls for a systemic architecture in which technical transparency, institutional accountability, and expert support operate together to satisfy the unique demands created by hybridity.

Artificial SocietiesVol. 21(1)
State Academic University of Humanities (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Cyborg’s Responsibility. Part 2. Mechanisms and Practices for Implementing Responsibility in the Cyber-Physical World — Oleg Gurov · Artificial Societies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS