Analysis of Cross-Cultural Trust and Vehicle Operation Metrics for Self-Driving Cars

This paper presents an exploratory cross-cultural analysis of autonomous vehicle expectations through a 57-question survey distributed in the United States (n = 50), Germany (n = 66), and Panama (n = 41). Five scales are presented and validated: Driving Behavior Aggressiveness (DBA), Self-Driving Car Aggressiveness (SDCA), Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trust (AIT), AI Driving Mechanics Trust (AIDMT), and Driver Safety Score (DSS). Each scale is validated via confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group measurement invariance testing. Results show that drivers prefer a self-driving car driving style more conservative than their own; however, participants who are more trustful of AI show DBA–SDCA equivalence, consistent with acceptance of a driving style comparable to their own. Significant cross-cultural differences emerge, with Panama diverging from the United States and Germany on DBA, SDCA, AIDMT, and DSS; these country effects largely persist after controlling for demographics. These findings suggest that self-driving car behaviors should be tailored to regional expectations and passenger trust profiles to improve adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17030161
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Cross-Cultural Trust and Vehicle Operation Metrics for Self-Driving Cars

Steven Tolbert, Mehrdad Nojoumian
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Analysis of Cross-Cultural Trust and Vehicle Operation Metrics for Self-Driving Cars

Steven Tolbert, Mehrdad Nojoumian
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an exploratory cross-cultural analysis of autonomous vehicle expectations through a 57-question survey distributed in the United States (n = 50), Germany (n = 66), and Panama (n = 41). Five scales are presented and validated: Driving Behavior Aggressiveness (DBA), Self-Driving Car Aggressiveness (SDCA), Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trust (AIT), AI Driving Mechanics Trust (AIDMT), and Driver Safety Score (DSS). Each scale is validated via confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group measurement invariance testing. Results show that drivers prefer a self-driving car driving style more conservative than their own; however, participants who are more trustful of AI show DBA–SDCA equivalence, consistent with acceptance of a driving style comparable to their own. Significant cross-cultural differences emerge, with Panama diverging from the United States and Germany on DBA, SDCA, AIDMT, and DSS; these country effects largely persist after controlling for demographics. These findings suggest that self-driving car behaviors should be tailored to regional expectations and passenger trust profiles to improve adoption.

World Electric Vehicle JournalVol. 17(3)
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.