Value set of EQ-5D-Y-3L for Hong Kong

The EQ-5D-Y instrument is currently used to assess health-related quality of life of health states experienced by young populations. However, a country-specific EQ-5D-Y value set for Hong Kong (HK) is not yet available. The study aimed to develop an HK-specific value set for the EQ-5D-Y, following the valuation proposal recommended by the EuroQol Group. The study included a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) exercise to estimate the relative importance of each level within the five dimensions of the EQ-5D-Y. A composite Time-Trade Off (C-TTO) was also conducted to anchor the latent scale derived from the DCE to the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) 0–1 scale. Both tasks were administered using the EQ-PVT platform. Responses were collected from adults in the general population, who completed the elicitation tasks from a child’s perspective. A total of 1,001 adult participants responded for the Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE), while 205 adults completed the Composite Time Trade-Off (C-TTO) tasks. The sample was representative of the general Chinese population in HK in terms of age, sex, and geographical distribution. Among the five EQ-5D-Y dimensions, the most influential in determining health state preferences was pain/discomfort, followed by feeling worried, sad, or unhappy; performing usual activities; mobility; and self-care. This study presents an EQ-5D-Y-3 L value set for the HK Chinese young population, following the international valuation protocol of this instrument. This value set enables future use of the EQ-5D-Y-3 L for measuring health-related quality of life and conducting economic evaluation for children and adolescents. • Among the five EQ-5D-Y dimensions, pain/discomfort emerged as the most influential factor in shaping health state preferences, followed by feeling worried, sad, or unhappy, performing usual activities, mobility, and self-care. This ranking differs from that observed in adult Chinese populations, underscoring the need for a distinct, youth-specific value set to capture health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. • The study establishes the EQ-5D-Y-3 L value set specifically for children and adolescents in Hong Kong which can provide a robust instrument for assessing health-related quality of life among the young population. • The instrument also enables economic evaluations of health interventions, supporting evidence-based resource allocation for the younger population within this jurisdiction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02522-y
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value set of EQ-5D-Y-3L for Hong Kong

A Wong, Kevin Wang, CK Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong et al.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Value set of EQ-5D-Y-3L for Hong Kong

A Wong, Kevin Wang, CK Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Annie Wai-Ling Cheung, Nan Luo
article en

Abstract

The EQ-5D-Y instrument is currently used to assess health-related quality of life of health states experienced by young populations. However, a country-specific EQ-5D-Y value set for Hong Kong (HK) is not yet available. The study aimed to develop an HK-specific value set for the EQ-5D-Y, following the valuation proposal recommended by the EuroQol Group. The study included a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) exercise to estimate the relative importance of each level within the five dimensions of the EQ-5D-Y. A composite Time-Trade Off (C-TTO) was also conducted to anchor the latent scale derived from the DCE to the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) 0–1 scale. Both tasks were administered using the EQ-PVT platform. Responses were collected from adults in the general population, who completed the elicitation tasks from a child’s perspective. A total of 1,001 adult participants responded for the Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE), while 205 adults completed the Composite Time Trade-Off (C-TTO) tasks. The sample was representative of the general Chinese population in HK in terms of age, sex, and geographical distribution. Among the five EQ-5D-Y dimensions, the most influential in determining health state preferences was pain/discomfort, followed by feeling worried, sad, or unhappy; performing usual activities; mobility; and self-care. This study presents an EQ-5D-Y-3 L value set for the HK Chinese young population, following the international valuation protocol of this instrument. This value set enables future use of the EQ-5D-Y-3 L for measuring health-related quality of life and conducting economic evaluation for children and adolescents. • Among the five EQ-5D-Y dimensions, pain/discomfort emerged as the most influential factor in shaping health state preferences, followed by feeling worried, sad, or unhappy, performing usual activities, mobility, and self-care. This ranking differs from that observed in adult Chinese populations, underscoring the need for a distinct, youth-specific value set to capture health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. • The study establishes the EQ-5D-Y-3 L value set specifically for children and adolescents in Hong Kong which can provide a robust instrument for assessing health-related quality of life among the young population. • The instrument also enables economic evaluations of health interventions, supporting evidence-based resource allocation for the younger population within this jurisdiction.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
National University of Singapore (SG), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Prince of Wales Hospital (CN), Science Oxford (GB), National University Health System (SG), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.