Beyond Biomarkers: Empiric Immunotherapy in Refractory Epilepsy and the Search for Responders

Sustained Rescue of Seizure Control in Patients With Highly Refractory Chronic Epilepsy Using Empiric Immunotherapy Doran E, Kelly A, Stanila R, Healy L, Doherty CP. Epilepsia . 2025 Aug;66(8):2743-2753. Objective: Following emerging evidence of autoimmune-associated seizures in medication-refractory epilepsy, we began offering a trial of immunotherapy to selected patients. Here, we review this approach's treatment response, predictive clinical features, and utility. Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study (2018–2022) of empiric, palliative immunotherapy in 31 adults with highly refractory, highly active epilepsy. Since 2018, in line with the International League Against Epilepsy's addition of “immune” as an etiology in the Classification of Epilepsy, we initiated immunotherapy after comprehensive antiseizure medication failures while at the same time screening for an autoimmune origin. The workup included assessing clinical features, serum autoantibody testing, cerebrospinal fluid testing (where feasible), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroencephalography. All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone or IV immunoglobulin according to previously published protocols, and follow-up was for at least 12 months. Results: Nine patients (29%) in this highly refractory cohort demonstrated a sustained treatment response, measured as a greater than 50% improvement in seizure frequency for at least 12 months. Three patients (10%) became seizure-free. Six patients (20%) were classified as partial responders and experienced an initial response that was not sustained. Apart from a trend toward a diagnosis of focal epilepsy, we did not identify any specific serological, clinical, electrodiagnostic, or imaging features with statistical significance that were predictive of treatment response. Significance: This patient group demonstrated a reasonable response rate to an immunotherapy trial. These findings are surprising but support the consideration of an immunotherapy trial in patients with refractory epilepsy. Requirements for repeated courses of immunotherapy differed significantly between patients, and this is an area of interest for further research. The basis for response in this cohort remains unclear; in some cases, antiseizure medication changes may have contributed; however, without any apparent autoimmune features, we consider potential blood–brain barrier repair or a placebo effect as hypothetical alternative mechanisms of action for the response to immunotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597261435133
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Biomarkers: Empiric Immunotherapy in Refractory Epilepsy and the Search for Responders

Samuel Lapalme-Remis
Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Beyond Biomarkers: Empiric Immunotherapy in Refractory Epilepsy and the Search for Responders

Samuel Lapalme-Remis
article en

Abstract

Sustained Rescue of Seizure Control in Patients With Highly Refractory Chronic Epilepsy Using Empiric Immunotherapy Doran E, Kelly A, Stanila R, Healy L, Doherty CP. Epilepsia . 2025 Aug;66(8):2743-2753. Objective: Following emerging evidence of autoimmune-associated seizures in medication-refractory epilepsy, we began offering a trial of immunotherapy to selected patients. Here, we review this approach's treatment response, predictive clinical features, and utility. Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study (2018–2022) of empiric, palliative immunotherapy in 31 adults with highly refractory, highly active epilepsy. Since 2018, in line with the International League Against Epilepsy's addition of “immune” as an etiology in the Classification of Epilepsy, we initiated immunotherapy after comprehensive antiseizure medication failures while at the same time screening for an autoimmune origin. The workup included assessing clinical features, serum autoantibody testing, cerebrospinal fluid testing (where feasible), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroencephalography. All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone or IV immunoglobulin according to previously published protocols, and follow-up was for at least 12 months. Results: Nine patients (29%) in this highly refractory cohort demonstrated a sustained treatment response, measured as a greater than 50% improvement in seizure frequency for at least 12 months. Three patients (10%) became seizure-free. Six patients (20%) were classified as partial responders and experienced an initial response that was not sustained. Apart from a trend toward a diagnosis of focal epilepsy, we did not identify any specific serological, clinical, electrodiagnostic, or imaging features with statistical significance that were predictive of treatment response. Significance: This patient group demonstrated a reasonable response rate to an immunotherapy trial. These findings are surprising but support the consideration of an immunotherapy trial in patients with refractory epilepsy. Requirements for repeated courses of immunotherapy differed significantly between patients, and this is an area of interest for further research. The basis for response in this cohort remains unclear; in some cases, antiseizure medication changes may have contributed; however, without any apparent autoimmune features, we consider potential blood–brain barrier repair or a placebo effect as hypothetical alternative mechanisms of action for the response to immunotherapy.

Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.