Japanese cancer survivors have a higher risk of fragility fractures over ten years

This study aimed to clarify the risk of fragility fractures (FFs) in Japanese cancer survivors compared with individuals without cancer by incorporating time-dependent variables. In a 10-year cohort of 10,330 adults aged 40–69 years, we assessed the risk of FFs (i.e., hip, vertebral compression, and distal radius fractures) associated with cancer status by using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards analyses. The models were adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors. The time-dependent variables included cancer status and age. Analyses were performed according to cancer treatment status, number of primary cancers, and cancer site. Among the 10,330 participants (mean age, 56.4 years; females, 6148), 386 experienced FFs. Compared with participants without cancer, a higher risk of overall FFs was observed in participants with cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–1.89). This risk was further elevated among participants with active cancer (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.15–2.55), multiple primary cancers (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04–1.95), stomach cancer (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01–3.37), kidney cancer (HR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.20–11.70), and hematologic cancer (HR, 7.70; 95% CI, 2.45–24.16). These findings highlight the importance of FF prevention strategies in cancer survivorship care in aging Asian populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45389-1
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Japanese cancer survivors have a higher risk of fragility fractures over ten years

Megumi Hara, Yuichiro Nishida, Keitaro Tanaka, Takaomi Kobayashi et al.
Scientific Reports
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Japanese cancer survivors have a higher risk of fragility fractures over ten years

Megumi Hara, Yuichiro Nishida, Keitaro Tanaka, Takaomi Kobayashi, Chisato Shimanoe, Mikako Horita, Takuma Furukawa, Yasuki Higaki, Tadatsugu Morimoto, Hinako Nanri
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the risk of fragility fractures (FFs) in Japanese cancer survivors compared with individuals without cancer by incorporating time-dependent variables. In a 10-year cohort of 10,330 adults aged 40–69 years, we assessed the risk of FFs (i.e., hip, vertebral compression, and distal radius fractures) associated with cancer status by using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards analyses. The models were adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors. The time-dependent variables included cancer status and age. Analyses were performed according to cancer treatment status, number of primary cancers, and cancer site. Among the 10,330 participants (mean age, 56.4 years; females, 6148), 386 experienced FFs. Compared with participants without cancer, a higher risk of overall FFs was observed in participants with cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–1.89). This risk was further elevated among participants with active cancer (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.15–2.55), multiple primary cancers (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04–1.95), stomach cancer (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01–3.37), kidney cancer (HR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.20–11.70), and hematologic cancer (HR, 7.70; 95% CI, 2.45–24.16). These findings highlight the importance of FF prevention strategies in cancer survivorship care in aging Asian populations.

Scientific Reports
Saga University (JP), Saitama Prefectural University (JP), Fukuoka University (JP), National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition (JP), Nakamura Gakuen University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.