Machine Unlearning: A Perspective, Taxonomy, and Benchmark Evaluation

Machine Learning (ML) models trained on large-scale datasets learn useful predictive patterns, but they may also memorize undesired information, leading to risks such as information leakage, bias, copyright violations, and privacy attacks. As these models are increasingly deployed in real-world and regulated settings, the consequences of such memorization become practical and high-stakes, reinforced by data-protection frameworks that grant individuals a Right to be Forgotten (e.g., the GDPR). Simply removing a record from the training dataset does not guarantee the elimination of its influence from the model, while retrain-from-scratch procedures are often prohibitive for modern architectures, including Transformers and Large Language Models (LLMs). In this work, we provide a perspective on Machine Unlearning (MU) in supervised learning settings, with a particular focus on Natural Language Processing (NLP) scenarios, grounded in a PRISMA-driven systematic review. We propose a multi-level taxonomy that organizes MU techniques along practical and conceptual dimensions, including exactness (exact versus approximate), unlearning granularity, guarantees, and application constraints. To complement this perspective, we run an illustrative benchmark evaluation using a standardized unlearning protocol on DistilBERT trained on a public corpus of news headlines for topic classification, contrasting the retraining gold standard with representative design-for-unlearning and approximate post hoc techniques. For completeness, we also report two oracle-assisted upper-bound baselines (distillation and scrubbing) that rely on a clean retrained reference model, and we account for their incremental cost separately. Our analysis jointly considers model utility, probabilistic quality, forgetting and privacy indicators, as well as computational efficiency. The results highlight systematic trade-offs between accuracy, computational cost, and removal effectiveness, providing practical guidance for selecting machine unlearning techniques in realistic deployment scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Internet
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi18030174
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Unlearning: A Perspective, Taxonomy, and Benchmark Evaluation

Fabrizio Marozzo, Cristian Cosentino, Pietro Liò, Simone Gatto
Future Internet
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Machine Unlearning: A Perspective, Taxonomy, and Benchmark Evaluation

Fabrizio Marozzo, Cristian Cosentino, Pietro Liò, Simone Gatto
article en

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) models trained on large-scale datasets learn useful predictive patterns, but they may also memorize undesired information, leading to risks such as information leakage, bias, copyright violations, and privacy attacks. As these models are increasingly deployed in real-world and regulated settings, the consequences of such memorization become practical and high-stakes, reinforced by data-protection frameworks that grant individuals a Right to be Forgotten (e.g., the GDPR). Simply removing a record from the training dataset does not guarantee the elimination of its influence from the model, while retrain-from-scratch procedures are often prohibitive for modern architectures, including Transformers and Large Language Models (LLMs). In this work, we provide a perspective on Machine Unlearning (MU) in supervised learning settings, with a particular focus on Natural Language Processing (NLP) scenarios, grounded in a PRISMA-driven systematic review. We propose a multi-level taxonomy that organizes MU techniques along practical and conceptual dimensions, including exactness (exact versus approximate), unlearning granularity, guarantees, and application constraints. To complement this perspective, we run an illustrative benchmark evaluation using a standardized unlearning protocol on DistilBERT trained on a public corpus of news headlines for topic classification, contrasting the retraining gold standard with representative design-for-unlearning and approximate post hoc techniques. For completeness, we also report two oracle-assisted upper-bound baselines (distillation and scrubbing) that rely on a clean retrained reference model, and we account for their incremental cost separately. Our analysis jointly considers model utility, probabilistic quality, forgetting and privacy indicators, as well as computational efficiency. The results highlight systematic trade-offs between accuracy, computational cost, and removal effectiveness, providing practical guidance for selecting machine unlearning techniques in realistic deployment scenarios.

Future InternetVol. 18(3)
University of Cambridge (GB), University of Calabria (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.