Updating the environmental regulation of liquified CO <sub>2</sub> storage in ports to support carbon capture and storage plans in the UK

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to the UK's Net-Zero Strategy, with shipping and ports playing a key role in enabling flexible CO 2 transport and storage (T&amp;S) where pipelines infrastructure is not available. However, the regulation of the temporary storage of liquified CO 2 (LCO 2 ) in UK ports remains underexplored, particularly under the environmental permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 (EPR). In this paper, we critically assess the EPR's suitability for regulating temporary LCO 2 storage in ports in support of CCS. We examine the scope and limitations of the EPR's current CCS regime and explore whether other provisions can address the regulatory gaps that arise when storage occurs away from capture sites. We identify key barriers that risk delaying the environmentally safe deployment of port-based LCO 2 storage. Our findings show that, while the EPR provides a solid foundation for environmental protection, it lacks the clarity and flexibility needed to address the regulatory complexities of shipping-based CCS and non-pipeline transport (NPT). We propose targeted regulatory reforms to improve legal certainty, support infrastructure rollout, and align environmental safeguards with net-zero goals. Our analysis informs ongoing UK decarbonisation policy and highlights regulatory issues likely to emerge internationally as CO 2 shipping scales up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Law Review
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529261432963
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updating the environmental regulation of liquified CO 2 storage in ports to support carbon capture and storage plans in the UK

Johanna Hjalmarsson, Lindsay‐Marie Armstrong, Alexandros X.M. Ntovas, Wassim Dbouk et al.
Environmental Law Review
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Updating the environmental regulation of liquified CO 2 storage in ports to support carbon capture and storage plans in the UK

Johanna Hjalmarsson, Lindsay‐Marie Armstrong, Alexandros X.M. Ntovas, Wassim Dbouk, Stephen R. Turnock, Damon A.H. Teagle
article en

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to the UK's Net-Zero Strategy, with shipping and ports playing a key role in enabling flexible CO 2 transport and storage (T&amp;S) where pipelines infrastructure is not available. However, the regulation of the temporary storage of liquified CO 2 (LCO 2 ) in UK ports remains underexplored, particularly under the environmental permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 (EPR). In this paper, we critically assess the EPR's suitability for regulating temporary LCO 2 storage in ports in support of CCS. We examine the scope and limitations of the EPR's current CCS regime and explore whether other provisions can address the regulatory gaps that arise when storage occurs away from capture sites. We identify key barriers that risk delaying the environmentally safe deployment of port-based LCO 2 storage. Our findings show that, while the EPR provides a solid foundation for environmental protection, it lacks the clarity and flexibility needed to address the regulatory complexities of shipping-based CCS and non-pipeline transport (NPT). We propose targeted regulatory reforms to improve legal certainty, support infrastructure rollout, and align environmental safeguards with net-zero goals. Our analysis informs ongoing UK decarbonisation policy and highlights regulatory issues likely to emerge internationally as CO 2 shipping scales up.

Environmental Law Review
University of Southampton (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Updating the environmental regulation of liquified CO <sub>2</sub> storage in ports to support carbon capture and storage plans in the UK — Johanna Hjalmarsson, Lindsay‐Marie Armstrong, et al. · Environmental Law Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS