Motor activation in cue-guided behavior: Neural evidence from human Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT)

In everyday life, our behavior is often guided by environmental cues that predict rewarding or aversive outcomes. The Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm provides a framework for examining how conditioned stimuli (CS) influence instrumental actions (R) associated with specific outcomes (O). Two distinct mechanisms have been identified: specific PIT, where a cue selectively invigorates the action linked to the same outcome, and general PIT, where reward-predictive cues non-selectively enhance response vigor. Theoretical accounts propose that specific PIT depends on the reactivation of learned action representations by sensory-specific cues, yet it remains unclear whether such reactivation occurs during passive cue exposure (Pavlovian phase) and how it evolves across learning. Using fMRI (N = 31), we investigated cue-evoked neural activity during two Pavlovian learning phases, before and after instrumental learning, in a four-phase PIT paradigm. Behaviorally, participants showed robust specific and general PIT effects in the transfer phase. At the neural level, general PIT-related cues engaged occipito-temporal visual and associative regions early in learning, whereas specific PIT-related cues recruited fronto-parietal, premotor, sensorimotor and striatal regions (MFG, IPS, PMC/M1/S1, caudate, putamen) after instrumental learning. These findings indicate that Pavlovian cues dynamically engage motor and sensorimotor systems following action-outcome learning, consistent with outcome-mediated retrieval of learned action representations even in the absence of overt movement. Together, the results refine theoretical models of PIT by demonstrating learning-dependent modulation of corticostriatal circuits during passive cue processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121874
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motor activation in cue-guided behavior: Neural evidence from human Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT)

Lara Bardi, Francesca Starita, Yulong Huang, Junjie Wei et al.
NeuroImage
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Motor activation in cue-guided behavior: Neural evidence from human Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT)

Lara Bardi, Francesca Starita, Yulong Huang, Junjie Wei, Michel Desmurget, Sara Garofalo, Chen Qu, Angela Sirigu, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Valeria Gazzola, Gianluca Finotti, Luigi A.E. Degni, Ruth Krebs
article en

Abstract

In everyday life, our behavior is often guided by environmental cues that predict rewarding or aversive outcomes. The Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) paradigm provides a framework for examining how conditioned stimuli (CS) influence instrumental actions (R) associated with specific outcomes (O). Two distinct mechanisms have been identified: specific PIT, where a cue selectively invigorates the action linked to the same outcome, and general PIT, where reward-predictive cues non-selectively enhance response vigor. Theoretical accounts propose that specific PIT depends on the reactivation of learned action representations by sensory-specific cues, yet it remains unclear whether such reactivation occurs during passive cue exposure (Pavlovian phase) and how it evolves across learning. Using fMRI (N = 31), we investigated cue-evoked neural activity during two Pavlovian learning phases, before and after instrumental learning, in a four-phase PIT paradigm. Behaviorally, participants showed robust specific and general PIT effects in the transfer phase. At the neural level, general PIT-related cues engaged occipito-temporal visual and associative regions early in learning, whereas specific PIT-related cues recruited fronto-parietal, premotor, sensorimotor and striatal regions (MFG, IPS, PMC/M1/S1, caudate, putamen) after instrumental learning. These findings indicate that Pavlovian cues dynamically engage motor and sensorimotor systems following action-outcome learning, consistent with outcome-mediated retrieval of learned action representations even in the absence of overt movement. Together, the results refine theoretical models of PIT by demonstrating learning-dependent modulation of corticostriatal circuits during passive cue processing.

NeuroImageVol. 331
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), Inserm (FR), South China Normal University (CN), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (FR), Laboratoire des applications Thérapeutiques des Ultrasons (FR), University of Bologna (IT), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.