Water use of interseeded cover crops in rainfed maize–soybean rotations in the Northern U.S.

Introduction Cover crop adoption in U.S. crop rotations is steadily increasing. In the upper Midwest, where the conventional maize ( Zea mays L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation is mostly rainfed, there is legitimate concern that cover crops may affect available soil water and the establishment of the subsequent main crop. Methods A study was conducted to evaluate 1) the effect of interseeded cover crops on soil moisture at seeding and termination, and subsequent maize and soybean yields, and 2) seasonal evapotranspiration ( ET ) or water use of the main crops and cover crops. Field trials were conducted from 2016 to 2019 at three locations in the upper Midwest using four treatments: monoculture cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.), two-species rye + crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), three-species rye + clover + forage radish ( Raphanus sativus L.), and a fallow (no-cover planted) as the control. Results The ET of cover crops varied between 52 and 110 mm, 70% of which was attributed to its evaporation component. Meanwhile the ET for maize and soybean ranged from 364–516 mm and 378–503 mm, respectively, 20% of which was attributed to evaporation. Regardless of the interseeding strategy, the biomass of cover crops was low in two out of the three experimental years due to weather conditions, resulting in little to no effect on soil water content or crop yield. Discussion Our findings suggest that late interseeded cover crops for conditions in the northern U.S. may have limited impact on soil available water or the productivity of the subsequent crop when cover crop growth is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Agronomy
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1761663
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water use of interseeded cover crops in rainfed maize–soybean rotations in the Northern U.S.

Gregg A. Johnson, Lizabeth Stahl, Axel García y García, Jeffrey S. Strock et al.
Frontiers in Agronomy
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Water use of interseeded cover crops in rainfed maize–soybean rotations in the Northern U.S.

Gregg A. Johnson, Lizabeth Stahl, Axel García y García, Jeffrey S. Strock, Hannah L. Rusch, Shuhui Liu
article en

Abstract

Introduction Cover crop adoption in U.S. crop rotations is steadily increasing. In the upper Midwest, where the conventional maize ( Zea mays L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation is mostly rainfed, there is legitimate concern that cover crops may affect available soil water and the establishment of the subsequent main crop. Methods A study was conducted to evaluate 1) the effect of interseeded cover crops on soil moisture at seeding and termination, and subsequent maize and soybean yields, and 2) seasonal evapotranspiration ( ET ) or water use of the main crops and cover crops. Field trials were conducted from 2016 to 2019 at three locations in the upper Midwest using four treatments: monoculture cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.), two-species rye + crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), three-species rye + clover + forage radish ( Raphanus sativus L.), and a fallow (no-cover planted) as the control. Results The ET of cover crops varied between 52 and 110 mm, 70% of which was attributed to its evaporation component. Meanwhile the ET for maize and soybean ranged from 364–516 mm and 378–503 mm, respectively, 20% of which was attributed to evaporation. Regardless of the interseeding strategy, the biomass of cover crops was low in two out of the three experimental years due to weather conditions, resulting in little to no effect on soil water content or crop yield. Discussion Our findings suggest that late interseeded cover crops for conditions in the northern U.S. may have limited impact on soil available water or the productivity of the subsequent crop when cover crop growth is low.

Frontiers in AgronomyVol. 8
University of Minnesota (US), University of Wisconsin–Extension (US), University of Minnesota, Waseca (US), Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.