Outcomes and predictors of success of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage for pancreatic leaks and fistulas: a multicenter retrospective study

Pancreatic duct leaks and fistulas are challenging complications of pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery. Although endoscopic retrograde pancreatic duct drainage (ERPD) is widely used, optimal drainage strategies remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and identify predictors of clinical success of ERPD in patients with pancreatic leaks and fistulas. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of consecutive patients with pancreatic duct leaks or fistulas refractory to conservative therapy who underwent ERPD at four tertiary centers between July 2007 and August 2023. Fistulas were classified using an endoscopy-oriented system. Drainage strategies were categorized as type A (stent placed across the leak), type B (stent placed adjacent to the leak), or type C (stent placed into the collection cavity). The primary outcome was clinical success within 3 months. Independent predictors of clinical success were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 106 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in 98.2% of procedures, and overall clinical success was 79.2%. Clinical success rates were similar between pancreatitis-related leaks and postoperative or traumatic leaks (78.9% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.893). Leak-bridging drainage (type A) was associated with a significantly higher clinical success rate than non–leak-bridging drainage (94.4% vs. 71.4%). Type IIC fistulas had the lowest success rate (36.4%). On multivariable analysis, leak-bridging drainage independently predicted clinical success (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.3–31.2; P = 0.020), whereas type IIC fistulas were associated with reduced odds of success (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.027–0.476; P = 0.003). When leak bridging was not feasible, type B drainage achieved higher success than type C drainage (83.3% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.007). ERPD is a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic duct leaks and fistulas. Leak-bridging drainage is strongly associated with clinical success and should be prioritized whenever feasible. When bridging cannot be achieved, stent placement adjacent to the leak appears more effective than intracavitary drainage. Type IIC fistulas remain challenging and may require alternative or adjunctive interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04758-w
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes and predictors of success of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage for pancreatic leaks and fistulas: a multicenter retrospective study

Yaqi Zhai, Yan Liang, Zhenjuan Li, mingyang Li et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Outcomes and predictors of success of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage for pancreatic leaks and fistulas: a multicenter retrospective study

Yaqi Zhai, Yan Liang, Zhenjuan Li, mingyang Li, Ziyi He, D Chen, Yanmei Peng, Shengxin Chen, Haowen Dai, Yuming Han, Lichao Zhang, Guanjun Zhang, Zhidong Xing, Changqin Li, Hui Ding
article en

Abstract

Pancreatic duct leaks and fistulas are challenging complications of pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery. Although endoscopic retrograde pancreatic duct drainage (ERPD) is widely used, optimal drainage strategies remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and identify predictors of clinical success of ERPD in patients with pancreatic leaks and fistulas. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of consecutive patients with pancreatic duct leaks or fistulas refractory to conservative therapy who underwent ERPD at four tertiary centers between July 2007 and August 2023. Fistulas were classified using an endoscopy-oriented system. Drainage strategies were categorized as type A (stent placed across the leak), type B (stent placed adjacent to the leak), or type C (stent placed into the collection cavity). The primary outcome was clinical success within 3 months. Independent predictors of clinical success were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 106 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in 98.2% of procedures, and overall clinical success was 79.2%. Clinical success rates were similar between pancreatitis-related leaks and postoperative or traumatic leaks (78.9% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.893). Leak-bridging drainage (type A) was associated with a significantly higher clinical success rate than non–leak-bridging drainage (94.4% vs. 71.4%). Type IIC fistulas had the lowest success rate (36.4%). On multivariable analysis, leak-bridging drainage independently predicted clinical success (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.3–31.2; P = 0.020), whereas type IIC fistulas were associated with reduced odds of success (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.027–0.476; P = 0.003). When leak bridging was not feasible, type B drainage achieved higher success than type C drainage (83.3% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.007). ERPD is a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic duct leaks and fistulas. Leak-bridging drainage is strongly associated with clinical success and should be prioritized whenever feasible. When bridging cannot be achieved, stent placement adjacent to the leak appears more effective than intracavitary drainage. Type IIC fistulas remain challenging and may require alternative or adjunctive interventions.

BMC Gastroenterology
Hebei Medical University (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN), Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.