Can Virtual Reality Promote Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Learning? A Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analytic Evidence

This umbrella review provides a thorough synthesis of evidence on the impact of virtual reality on three domains of learning (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor), informed by Bloom’s Taxonomy. Content analysis was applied to 93 articles comprising 70 systematic reviews, 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and 6 meta-analyses, extracted from three databases (i.e., Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore). The results indicated that affective learning in VR was most widely reported, followed by cognitive and psychomotor domains of learning. In the cognitive domain, VR showed more consistent benefits, especially for knowledge acquisition and higher-order cognitive skills (e.g., problem-solving, intellectual skills), although a few meta-analyses reported non-significant effects. Across the affective domain, findings were mixed but generally suggested VR could improve self-efficacy, self-confidence, and satisfaction, while evidence for various affective outcomes remained highly inconsistent. For the psychomotor domain, VR often enhanced motor, procedural, and safety-related skills, but results specifically for complex clinical skills were inconclusive. Future research should advance theory through exploring why and how VR influences learning while strengthening research designs and standardized measurements to determine under what conditions VR produces reliable improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331261434358
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Virtual Reality Promote Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Learning? A Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analytic Evidence

Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer, Alex Shum, Yuchun Zhong et al.
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Can Virtual Reality Promote Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Learning? A Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analytic Evidence

Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer, Alex Shum, Yuchun Zhong, Chunqi Li
article en

Abstract

This umbrella review provides a thorough synthesis of evidence on the impact of virtual reality on three domains of learning (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor), informed by Bloom’s Taxonomy. Content analysis was applied to 93 articles comprising 70 systematic reviews, 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and 6 meta-analyses, extracted from three databases (i.e., Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore). The results indicated that affective learning in VR was most widely reported, followed by cognitive and psychomotor domains of learning. In the cognitive domain, VR showed more consistent benefits, especially for knowledge acquisition and higher-order cognitive skills (e.g., problem-solving, intellectual skills), although a few meta-analyses reported non-significant effects. Across the affective domain, findings were mixed but generally suggested VR could improve self-efficacy, self-confidence, and satisfaction, while evidence for various affective outcomes remained highly inconsistent. For the psychomotor domain, VR often enhanced motor, procedural, and safety-related skills, but results specifically for complex clinical skills were inconclusive. Future research should advance theory through exploring why and how VR influences learning while strengthening research designs and standardized measurements to determine under what conditions VR produces reliable improvements.

Journal of Educational Computing Research
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Jiangxi Normal University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.