Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies

Humans regularly walk across uneven terrain, which demands reactive control strategies to maintain forward progress and stability. While reactive control during walking has been well described during straight gait, it is unclear how reactive control differs during turning gait. Because turning is asymmetrical, perturbations to the inside and outside limbs may elicit different reactive adjustments. This study investigates how unexpected underfoot perturbations alter stability measures during turning and how individuals alter their foot placement to maintain stability after such perturbations. Seven healthy adults completed walking trials around a circular track while wearing mechanized shoes that pseudo-randomly delivered underfoot perturbations to either the inside or outside limb. We calculated mediolateral margin of stability corrected for centripetal acceleration (ML MoSC), step width, and step length from kinematic data. Linear mixed effects models compared the effects of perturbation type (inversion vs eversion) and perturbation limb (inside vs outside) for each outcome measure. ML MoSC was affected by both perturbation type and perturbation limb, with larger changes observed during eversion, and outside, perturbations. Changes to step width and step time during two recovery steps after each perturbation were primarily influenced by the perturbation limb - outside perturbations elicited consistent changes during two recovery steps compared to one altered step after inside perturbations. Perturbations to the outside limb during turning disrupted gait longer than perturbations to the inside limb. This difference across perturbation limb may indicate that outside steps are more important than inside ones for maintaining and recovering stability during turning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.251471
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies

Peter C. Fino, Paula Kramer, Nicholas Kreter, Junseop Son et al.
Journal of Experimental Biology
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies

Peter C. Fino, Paula Kramer, Nicholas Kreter, Junseop Son, Tyler K. Ho, Cameron B. Jensen
article en

Abstract

Humans regularly walk across uneven terrain, which demands reactive control strategies to maintain forward progress and stability. While reactive control during walking has been well described during straight gait, it is unclear how reactive control differs during turning gait. Because turning is asymmetrical, perturbations to the inside and outside limbs may elicit different reactive adjustments. This study investigates how unexpected underfoot perturbations alter stability measures during turning and how individuals alter their foot placement to maintain stability after such perturbations. Seven healthy adults completed walking trials around a circular track while wearing mechanized shoes that pseudo-randomly delivered underfoot perturbations to either the inside or outside limb. We calculated mediolateral margin of stability corrected for centripetal acceleration (ML MoSC), step width, and step length from kinematic data. Linear mixed effects models compared the effects of perturbation type (inversion vs eversion) and perturbation limb (inside vs outside) for each outcome measure. ML MoSC was affected by both perturbation type and perturbation limb, with larger changes observed during eversion, and outside, perturbations. Changes to step width and step time during two recovery steps after each perturbation were primarily influenced by the perturbation limb - outside perturbations elicited consistent changes during two recovery steps compared to one altered step after inside perturbations. Perturbations to the outside limb during turning disrupted gait longer than perturbations to the inside limb. This difference across perturbation limb may indicate that outside steps are more important than inside ones for maintaining and recovering stability during turning.

Journal of Experimental Biology
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), University of Utah (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), Utah Department of Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.