Predictors of Late Adverse Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard in the treatment of carotid disease, a higher frequency of adverse outcomes can reduce its benefit. The aim of the present study is to identify factors related to myocardial infarction, stroke, death and restenosis as the late adverse outcomes of CEA. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> The retrospective cohort study included 1597 CEAs that were performed in 1533 consecutive patients at the Vascular Surgery Clinic in Belgrade from 2012 to 2017. Late adverse outcomes within 4 years after CEA were available for the majority of them. Data for myocardial infarction and stroke were available for 1223 CEAs, data for death for 1305 CEAs, and data for restenosis for 1162 CEAs. The association between possible risk factors and late adverse outcomes of CEA was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses. <i>Results:</i> During follow-up, myocardial infarction occurred after 55, stroke after 68, death after 103 and restenosis after 121 CEAs. Two factors were the most frequent predictors of late adverse outcomes, i.e., the patient's age and diabetes mellitus (DM). Age predicted all late adverse outcomes except restenosis, and DM predicted all of them. A predictor of myocardial infarction, besides age (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11) and DM (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11-2.29), was peripheral arterial disease (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.17-2.78) in personal history. Predictors were only age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and DM (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.72) for stroke, as well as for death (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.21 and HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.17-3.21, respectively). For restenosis, in addition to DM (HR 1.78, 95% CI 2.62), predictors were hyperlipidemia (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.27-9.76) and urgent surgery (HR 3.51, 95% CI 1.06-11.65). <i>Conclusions:</i> CEA should be performed with special caution in the elderly and diabetic patients. Modification of other risk factors and precise medical therapy are necessary to reduce possible adverse outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030593
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Late Adverse Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy

Slobodan Tanasković, Jelena Marinković, Danka Vukašinović, Hristina Vlajinac et al.
Medicina
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Predictors of Late Adverse Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy

Slobodan Tanasković, Jelena Marinković, Danka Vukašinović, Hristina Vlajinac, Miloš Maksimović, Branko Jakovljević, Andja Ćirković, Djordje Radak, Jelena Ilic Zivojinovic
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard in the treatment of carotid disease, a higher frequency of adverse outcomes can reduce its benefit. The aim of the present study is to identify factors related to myocardial infarction, stroke, death and restenosis as the late adverse outcomes of CEA. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> The retrospective cohort study included 1597 CEAs that were performed in 1533 consecutive patients at the Vascular Surgery Clinic in Belgrade from 2012 to 2017. Late adverse outcomes within 4 years after CEA were available for the majority of them. Data for myocardial infarction and stroke were available for 1223 CEAs, data for death for 1305 CEAs, and data for restenosis for 1162 CEAs. The association between possible risk factors and late adverse outcomes of CEA was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses. <i>Results:</i> During follow-up, myocardial infarction occurred after 55, stroke after 68, death after 103 and restenosis after 121 CEAs. Two factors were the most frequent predictors of late adverse outcomes, i.e., the patient's age and diabetes mellitus (DM). Age predicted all late adverse outcomes except restenosis, and DM predicted all of them. A predictor of myocardial infarction, besides age (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11) and DM (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11-2.29), was peripheral arterial disease (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.17-2.78) in personal history. Predictors were only age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and DM (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.72) for stroke, as well as for death (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.21 and HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.17-3.21, respectively). For restenosis, in addition to DM (HR 1.78, 95% CI 2.62), predictors were hyperlipidemia (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.27-9.76) and urgent surgery (HR 3.51, 95% CI 1.06-11.65). <i>Conclusions:</i> CEA should be performed with special caution in the elderly and diabetic patients. Modification of other risk factors and precise medical therapy are necessary to reduce possible adverse outcomes.

MedicinaVol. 62(3)
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (RS), University of Belgrade (RS), Euromedik (RS), Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.