Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of Integrated Energy Systems Considering Tiered Carbon Trading and Load-Side Demand Response

This paper proposes a multi-objective optimal scheduling model for integrated energy systems (IESs) that incorporates a tiered carbon emissions trading mechanism and load-side demand response (LDR) to promote sustainability. First, a reward–penalty-based tiered carbon cost model is embedded within the IES scheduling framework, internalizing carbon constraints and providing differentiated carbon price signals for emission reduction. Second, a refined demand response model is introduced, categorizing electrical and thermal loads to enhance flexibility in system operation. The demand response strategy allows for temporal load shifting and load reduction, optimizing the overall energy management. Third, the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON) is employed to minimize both total operating costs and carbon emissions. Scenario-based simulations are conducted to evaluate system performance under different configurations: the integrated carbon trading and LDR model, a carbon-trading-only approach, and a baseline scenario. The results show that the proposed model achieves the best performance, reducing operating costs by 13.6% and carbon emissions by 7.0% compared to the baseline. Additionally, the combined approach improves renewable energy utilization and reduces reliance on high-carbon energy sources, demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating carbon trading and demand response strategies for low-carbon and sustainable energy system management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063073
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of Integrated Energy Systems Considering Tiered Carbon Trading and Load-Side Demand Response

Ying Xu, Baoqing Lin, Shuhao Li, Yixin Lin et al.
Sustainability
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of Integrated Energy Systems Considering Tiered Carbon Trading and Load-Side Demand Response

Ying Xu, Baoqing Lin, Shuhao Li, Yixin Lin, Xiutao Gao
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a multi-objective optimal scheduling model for integrated energy systems (IESs) that incorporates a tiered carbon emissions trading mechanism and load-side demand response (LDR) to promote sustainability. First, a reward–penalty-based tiered carbon cost model is embedded within the IES scheduling framework, internalizing carbon constraints and providing differentiated carbon price signals for emission reduction. Second, a refined demand response model is introduced, categorizing electrical and thermal loads to enhance flexibility in system operation. The demand response strategy allows for temporal load shifting and load reduction, optimizing the overall energy management. Third, the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON) is employed to minimize both total operating costs and carbon emissions. Scenario-based simulations are conducted to evaluate system performance under different configurations: the integrated carbon trading and LDR model, a carbon-trading-only approach, and a baseline scenario. The results show that the proposed model achieves the best performance, reducing operating costs by 13.6% and carbon emissions by 7.0% compared to the baseline. Additionally, the combined approach improves renewable energy utilization and reduces reliance on high-carbon energy sources, demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating carbon trading and demand response strategies for low-carbon and sustainable energy system management.

SustainabilityVol. 18(6)
Huaqiao University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.