An Evaluation of Urban Living Street Space Quality from a Public Health Perspective: A Case Study of Changsha Central Urban Area

Urban living streets are core venues for promoting public health; however, existing studies often lack a multidimensional quantitative evaluation system that integrates physical, psychological, and social health dimensions. To address this gap, this study constructs a space quality evaluation model comprising 15 indicators across three health dimensions, integrating multi-source data (including Street View Imagery, POI data, and field measurements). Taking six typical living streets in the central urban area of Changsha as a case study, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine indicator weights and evaluate space quality. The results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity: (1) The comprehensive quality scores vary markedly, with Cai’e South Road ranking highest (66.62) and Zengjiawan Lane lowest (28.37); (2) key factor analysis indicates that seven indicators—including Street Width, Motorization Level, and POI Functional Diversity—are significantly associated with space quality, among which Sidewalk Width and Relative Sidewalk Width are identified as critical determinants; (3) addressing identified deficits in slow-traffic spaces and service amenities, this study proposes health-oriented micro-renewal strategies. This study provides a transferable analytical framework and practical decision support for the assessment and improvement of urban living street space quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030518
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation of Urban Living Street Space Quality from a Public Health Perspective: A Case Study of Changsha Central Urban Area

Mengmiao Zhang, Shaoyao He, Jiamin Li, Ye Qu et al.
Land
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

An Evaluation of Urban Living Street Space Quality from a Public Health Perspective: A Case Study of Changsha Central Urban Area

Mengmiao Zhang, Shaoyao He, Jiamin Li, Ye Qu, Gong Chen
article en

Abstract

Urban living streets are core venues for promoting public health; however, existing studies often lack a multidimensional quantitative evaluation system that integrates physical, psychological, and social health dimensions. To address this gap, this study constructs a space quality evaluation model comprising 15 indicators across three health dimensions, integrating multi-source data (including Street View Imagery, POI data, and field measurements). Taking six typical living streets in the central urban area of Changsha as a case study, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine indicator weights and evaluate space quality. The results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity: (1) The comprehensive quality scores vary markedly, with Cai’e South Road ranking highest (66.62) and Zengjiawan Lane lowest (28.37); (2) key factor analysis indicates that seven indicators—including Street Width, Motorization Level, and POI Functional Diversity—are significantly associated with space quality, among which Sidewalk Width and Relative Sidewalk Width are identified as critical determinants; (3) addressing identified deficits in slow-traffic spaces and service amenities, this study proposes health-oriented micro-renewal strategies. This study provides a transferable analytical framework and practical decision support for the assessment and improvement of urban living street space quality.

LandVol. 15(3)
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Central South University (CN), Hunan University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.