Comparison of the 200-Meter Race Phases Between Ergometer and On-Water Kayaks in Paralympic Canoe Sprint Athletes

<b>Background:</b> Understanding the phases of a 200-meter race is crucial for establishing effective competition strategies. Although ergometer and on-water kayaks present similar race phases, breakpoint differences may exist. <b>Purpose:</b> This study compared the phases of the 200-meter race performed on an ergometer and on-water kayak in Paralympic canoe sprint (PCS) athletes and attempted to develop equations to adjust on-water breakpoints based on ergometer tests. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-four international (n=8) and national (n = 16) PCS athletes (age: 34.5 years; time since injury: 14.6 years; PCS time: 4.7 years) completed a 200-meter maximum test on both ergometer and on-water kayaks. Race phases were identified using piecewise linear regression models (three- and four-phase), and breakpoint distances and times were compared using inferential statistics with a significance level set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Total time and velocity did not differ significantly between ergometer and on-water conditions. The first breakpoint occurred later on water compared to ergometer, with significant differences in distance (∆ = 26.5%, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) and time (∆ = 35.2%, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). The four-phase model showed very high coefficients of determination for both ergometer and on-water (R² = 0.97 and R² = 0.94), while the three-phase model showed high to very high values (R² = 0.94 and R² = 0.86). Regression equations for the first breakpoint were calculated but were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings indicate that the first breakpoint occurs earlier on ergometers, suggesting their potential utility for training monitoring and pacing strategy development. Nonetheless, physiological and biomechanical differences between ergometer and on-water conditions warrant caution in extrapolating results. Ergometer benchmarks may serve as useful targets for on-water training, particularly in refining acceleration phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125261437341
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the 200-Meter Race Phases Between Ergometer and On-Water Kayaks in Paralympic Canoe Sprint Athletes

Ciro Winckler, Frederico Ribeiro Neto, Rodrigo Rodrigues Gomes Costa, Luiz Gustavo Teixeira Fabrício Dos Santos
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Comparison of the 200-Meter Race Phases Between Ergometer and On-Water Kayaks in Paralympic Canoe Sprint Athletes

Ciro Winckler, Frederico Ribeiro Neto, Rodrigo Rodrigues Gomes Costa, Luiz Gustavo Teixeira Fabrício Dos Santos
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Understanding the phases of a 200-meter race is crucial for establishing effective competition strategies. Although ergometer and on-water kayaks present similar race phases, breakpoint differences may exist. <b>Purpose:</b> This study compared the phases of the 200-meter race performed on an ergometer and on-water kayak in Paralympic canoe sprint (PCS) athletes and attempted to develop equations to adjust on-water breakpoints based on ergometer tests. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-four international (n=8) and national (n = 16) PCS athletes (age: 34.5 years; time since injury: 14.6 years; PCS time: 4.7 years) completed a 200-meter maximum test on both ergometer and on-water kayaks. Race phases were identified using piecewise linear regression models (three- and four-phase), and breakpoint distances and times were compared using inferential statistics with a significance level set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Total time and velocity did not differ significantly between ergometer and on-water conditions. The first breakpoint occurred later on water compared to ergometer, with significant differences in distance (∆ = 26.5%, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) and time (∆ = 35.2%, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). The four-phase model showed very high coefficients of determination for both ergometer and on-water (R² = 0.97 and R² = 0.94), while the three-phase model showed high to very high values (R² = 0.94 and R² = 0.86). Regression equations for the first breakpoint were calculated but were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings indicate that the first breakpoint occurs earlier on ergometers, suggesting their potential utility for training monitoring and pacing strategy development. Nonetheless, physiological and biomechanical differences between ergometer and on-water conditions warrant caution in extrapolating results. Ergometer benchmarks may serve as useful targets for on-water training, particularly in refining acceleration phases.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.