Leadership competencies: a global bibliometric analysis (1960–2025)

Over the past few decades, research on leadership competencies has expanded considerably, shaping both academic inquiries and organisational practice. However, its conceptualisation and application remain limited, as many institutions still treat leadership competency models as static models rather than evolving capabilities. This study bridges the gap through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 1,993 publications indexed in Scopus (1960–2025), examining intellectual foundations, publication trends, and thematic evolution. Using BiblioMagika, BiblioMagika Split, OpenRefine, and VOSviewer, the study identifies steady growth with over 29,000 citations across social sciences, business, management, and health domains. The United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada are among the leading contributors, with strong international collaboration networks. Results highlight theoretical lenses, such as the resource-based view (RBV) and dynamic capabilities, alongside emerging themes in leadership competencies. Notably, sustainability remains insufficiently embedded within the discourse of leadership competencies, indicating a significant avenue for future examination. The study concludes that leadership competencies should not be regarded as fixed constructs but as adaptive, context-responsive capabilities that evolve with organisational and environmental dynamics. These insights provide a roadmap for integrating sustainability, innovation, and other contextual factors into future leadership competency models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02809-6
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership competencies: a global bibliometric analysis (1960–2025)

Zubir Azhar, Ahmad Ayobami
Discover Sustainability
Competency Development and Evaluation
article

Leadership competencies: a global bibliometric analysis (1960–2025)

Zubir Azhar, Ahmad Ayobami
article en

Abstract

Over the past few decades, research on leadership competencies has expanded considerably, shaping both academic inquiries and organisational practice. However, its conceptualisation and application remain limited, as many institutions still treat leadership competency models as static models rather than evolving capabilities. This study bridges the gap through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 1,993 publications indexed in Scopus (1960–2025), examining intellectual foundations, publication trends, and thematic evolution. Using BiblioMagika, BiblioMagika Split, OpenRefine, and VOSviewer, the study identifies steady growth with over 29,000 citations across social sciences, business, management, and health domains. The United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada are among the leading contributors, with strong international collaboration networks. Results highlight theoretical lenses, such as the resource-based view (RBV) and dynamic capabilities, alongside emerging themes in leadership competencies. Notably, sustainability remains insufficiently embedded within the discourse of leadership competencies, indicating a significant avenue for future examination. The study concludes that leadership competencies should not be regarded as fixed constructs but as adaptive, context-responsive capabilities that evolve with organisational and environmental dynamics. These insights provide a roadmap for integrating sustainability, innovation, and other contextual factors into future leadership competency models.

Discover Sustainability
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.