How Learning Culture Influences the Survivability of an Online Feedback Tool

Introduction: Many online tools and innovations exist to support feedback, but their survivability has not been well-studied. This study explores the influence of learning culture on the adoption, utilization and long-term impact of an online written feedback tool among faculty. The study aims to inform strategies for effective implementation of such tools and guide faculty development within the clinical learning environment. Methods: Utilizing constructivist grounded theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews among ten clinical faculty with supervisory roles and experience in giving medical trainees feedback via an online feedback tool. Using an iterative analytic approach, we identified key propositions to derive an in-depth understanding between learning culture (LC) and the “survivability” of the online feedback tool. Results: Several socio-cultural factors within the LC have affected the survivability of the feedback tool beyond its development and implementation. Firstly, the lack of a support system exacerbated the burden of clinical teachers. Next, the misapprehension about written feedback and low psychological safety undermined the tool adoption. Lastly, the lack of appreciation towards the importance of a strong feedback loop further reduced the tool’s survivability. Conclusion: The development and implementation of online tools in health professions education should take into consideration factors influencing the survivability of the tool. The exploration from a socio-cultural perspective has provided insights to ensure that future online feedback tools and interventions actually survive the test of time and the complexities embedded in the clinical learning environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Medical Education
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2166
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Learning Culture Influences the Survivability of an Online Feedback Tool

Arif Tyebally, Su Ann Khoo, Yang Yann Foo, Lorelei Lingard
Perspectives on Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

How Learning Culture Influences the Survivability of an Online Feedback Tool

Arif Tyebally, Su Ann Khoo, Yang Yann Foo, Lorelei Lingard
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Many online tools and innovations exist to support feedback, but their survivability has not been well-studied. This study explores the influence of learning culture on the adoption, utilization and long-term impact of an online written feedback tool among faculty. The study aims to inform strategies for effective implementation of such tools and guide faculty development within the clinical learning environment. Methods: Utilizing constructivist grounded theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews among ten clinical faculty with supervisory roles and experience in giving medical trainees feedback via an online feedback tool. Using an iterative analytic approach, we identified key propositions to derive an in-depth understanding between learning culture (LC) and the “survivability” of the online feedback tool. Results: Several socio-cultural factors within the LC have affected the survivability of the feedback tool beyond its development and implementation. Firstly, the lack of a support system exacerbated the burden of clinical teachers. Next, the misapprehension about written feedback and low psychological safety undermined the tool adoption. Lastly, the lack of appreciation towards the importance of a strong feedback loop further reduced the tool’s survivability. Conclusion: The development and implementation of online tools in health professions education should take into consideration factors influencing the survivability of the tool. The exploration from a socio-cultural perspective has provided insights to ensure that future online feedback tools and interventions actually survive the test of time and the complexities embedded in the clinical learning environment.

Perspectives on Medical EducationVol. 15(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.