Composite scores to detect and monitor cognitive dysfunction in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review

Cognitive composites combine scores from multiple neuropsychological tests and demonstrate greater sensitivity to Alzheimer's disease (AD) related cognitive changes than individual tests. This review examines the development, composition and validity of cognitive composites to detect AD-related cognitive changes. The included cognitive composites were evaluated using four criteria: cognitive domains assessed; neuropsychological tests used, the inclusion of non-neuropsychological measures (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination) that produce a global score themselves; and statistical methods used to calculate the composite. Existing composites fall into two categories: domain-specific (e.g., episodic memory, executive function, attention) or general composites combining multiple cognitive domains while incorporating clinical and functional measures. Psychometric properties were not consistently reported across all the studies. Therefore, a standardized validation framework is proposed to address these inconsistencies. Future work should focus on systematically evaluating optimized weighting, including data from clinical and functional measures and consistent psychometric reporting for assessing and monitoring cognitive dysfunction in early AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261433044
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Composite scores to detect and monitor cognitive dysfunction in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review

Kieran J. Marston, Yen Ying Lim, Brook Galna, Shaun Markovic et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Composite scores to detect and monitor cognitive dysfunction in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review

Kieran J. Marston, Yen Ying Lim, Brook Galna, Shaun Markovic, Bhargav Tallapragada, P. Maruff, Ralph N. Martins, Belinda M. Brown, Jurgen Fripp, Jason Hassenstab, Colin L. Masters, James D. Doecke, Rosita Shishegar, Hamid R. Sohrabi, Alden Gross
article en

Abstract

Cognitive composites combine scores from multiple neuropsychological tests and demonstrate greater sensitivity to Alzheimer's disease (AD) related cognitive changes than individual tests. This review examines the development, composition and validity of cognitive composites to detect AD-related cognitive changes. The included cognitive composites were evaluated using four criteria: cognitive domains assessed; neuropsychological tests used, the inclusion of non-neuropsychological measures (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination) that produce a global score themselves; and statistical methods used to calculate the composite. Existing composites fall into two categories: domain-specific (e.g., episodic memory, executive function, attention) or general composites combining multiple cognitive domains while incorporating clinical and functional measures. Psychometric properties were not consistently reported across all the studies. Therefore, a standardized validation framework is proposed to address these inconsistencies. Future work should focus on systematically evaluating optimized weighting, including data from clinical and functional measures and consistent psychometric reporting for assessing and monitoring cognitive dysfunction in early AD.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Edith Cowan University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Murdoch University (AU), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), Australian e-Health Research Centre (AU), Australian Alzheimer’s Research Foundation (AU), Monash University (AU), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.