Spatial Justice Evaluation of Psychological Therapeutic Landscapes in High-Density Residential Areas

The global mental health issue is becoming increasingly prominent. The fair supply of psychological therapeutic landscape spaces in urban high-density residential areas is a core path to ensuring the physical and mental health of residents and maintaining social health equity. This study takes the theory of spatial justice as the core framework, selects 20 typical high-density residential areas in Shijiazhuang City as empirical samples, and collects basic data through structured questionnaire surveys and on-site observations to explore the justice dilemma, evaluation system, and group demand differentiation characteristics of psychological therapeutic landscape spaces in high-density residential areas. The research results show that there are three core injustice problems in the psychological therapeutic landscape spaces of high-density residential areas: insufficient spatial inclusiveness, lack of ecological space justice, and incomplete facilities and management systems. Residents’ evaluations of the spatial justice of therapeutic landscapes can be divided into four dimensions: practical, ecological, social, and management. Among them, the ecological dimension is the core dimension that residents pay the most attention to. Individual characteristics such as gender, age, identity category, community activity duration, and governance participation willingness have a significant impact on residents’ evaluations of spatial justice. This study constructs an evaluation system for the spatial justice of therapeutic landscape spaces suitable for high-density residential areas, providing theoretical support and practical guidance for the planning, design, and optimization and renewal of fair and inclusive psychological therapeutic landscapes in high-density residential areas in northern China. At the same time, it provides a scientific basis for the construction of healthy cities and the practical application of spatial justice in the field of human settlements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061260
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Justice Evaluation of Psychological Therapeutic Landscapes in High-Density Residential Areas

Runzhe Shi, Xiangyu Liu, Xin Zhang
Buildings
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Spatial Justice Evaluation of Psychological Therapeutic Landscapes in High-Density Residential Areas

Runzhe Shi, Xiangyu Liu, Xin Zhang
article en

Abstract

The global mental health issue is becoming increasingly prominent. The fair supply of psychological therapeutic landscape spaces in urban high-density residential areas is a core path to ensuring the physical and mental health of residents and maintaining social health equity. This study takes the theory of spatial justice as the core framework, selects 20 typical high-density residential areas in Shijiazhuang City as empirical samples, and collects basic data through structured questionnaire surveys and on-site observations to explore the justice dilemma, evaluation system, and group demand differentiation characteristics of psychological therapeutic landscape spaces in high-density residential areas. The research results show that there are three core injustice problems in the psychological therapeutic landscape spaces of high-density residential areas: insufficient spatial inclusiveness, lack of ecological space justice, and incomplete facilities and management systems. Residents’ evaluations of the spatial justice of therapeutic landscapes can be divided into four dimensions: practical, ecological, social, and management. Among them, the ecological dimension is the core dimension that residents pay the most attention to. Individual characteristics such as gender, age, identity category, community activity duration, and governance participation willingness have a significant impact on residents’ evaluations of spatial justice. This study constructs an evaluation system for the spatial justice of therapeutic landscape spaces suitable for high-density residential areas, providing theoretical support and practical guidance for the planning, design, and optimization and renewal of fair and inclusive psychological therapeutic landscapes in high-density residential areas in northern China. At the same time, it provides a scientific basis for the construction of healthy cities and the practical application of spatial justice in the field of human settlements.

BuildingsVol. 16(6)
Shangqiu Institute of Technology (CN), Hebei Academy of Sciences (CN), Macao Polytechnic University (MO), Shangqiu Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.