Simulation Inconsistency Detection via Neurobiological and Cognitive Interfaces

A simulation, in this context, refers to a constructed environment governed by programmed rules rather than fundamental physical laws. This digital realm comprises two logically distinct subsystems that must interact seamlessly. The first subsystem is the world-engine, which calculates physics, chemistry, and the state of all objects. A second, separate subsystem manages the translation of this state data into the conscious experiences of entities within the simulation. These entities, such as human brains, possess their own biological apparatus for processing sensory information. Any communication between the world-engine and a brain constitutes a formal interface with a specific protocol. If this protocol has constraints or inefficiencies, the resulting interaction may produce detectable anomalies. Identifying these potential anomalies requires a clear model of where the simulation’s computations end and the brain’s biological processing begins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19195395
Primary Topic
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation Inconsistency Detection via Neurobiological and Cognitive Interfaces

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
article

Simulation Inconsistency Detection via Neurobiological and Cognitive Interfaces

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas
article en

Abstract

A simulation, in this context, refers to a constructed environment governed by programmed rules rather than fundamental physical laws. This digital realm comprises two logically distinct subsystems that must interact seamlessly. The first subsystem is the world-engine, which calculates physics, chemistry, and the state of all objects. A second, separate subsystem manages the translation of this state data into the conscious experiences of entities within the simulation. These entities, such as human brains, possess their own biological apparatus for processing sensory information. Any communication between the world-engine and a brain constitutes a formal interface with a specific protocol. If this protocol has constraints or inefficiencies, the resulting interaction may produce detectable anomalies. Identifying these potential anomalies requires a clear model of where the simulation’s computations end and the brain’s biological processing begins.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Q-Flex (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.