Precision livestock monitoring of lactating sows: YOLOv8-based behavioral analysis under varying feeding strategies

Feeding frequency and thermal environment are key factors influencing the behavior and welfare of lactating sows, as well as piglet access to milk. This study employed a deep learning-based computer vision approach using the YOLOv8l (You Only Look Once version 8 – large) model to automate multi-class behavior detection in lactating sows. Eight distinct behaviors were classified: feeding, not feeding, suckling, not suckling, lateral lying, sternal lying, standing, and sitting. The model achieved high performance (precision = 0.943, recall = 0.950, F1-score = 0.946, mAP@50 = 0.965). Three treatment groups were evaluated: Group 1 (feeding five times/day, air-conditioned), Group 2 (hourly feeding, air-conditioned), and Group 3 (hourly feeding, non-air-conditioned). Group 2 exhibited the highest suckling frequency (38.75; <italic>p</italic> = 0.035), feeding frequency (32.97; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), and the shortest feeding interval (30.21 min; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), suggesting enhanced interaction under frequent feeding with thermal control. Group 3 showed significantly higher lateral lying frequency (27.26; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), consistent with thermoregulatory behavior in warmer environments. Postural dynamics also varied: sternal lying was highest in Group 2 (45.56; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), while standing was more frequent in Group 2 (29.25; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001) but of shorter duration. These findings demonstrate that hourly feeding under air-conditioned conditions promotes more frequent feeding and suckling behaviors, while heat stress influences lying patterns. The YOLOv8l model proved to be a robust tool for automated behavior detection, supporting its applicability in precision livestock monitoring systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2500395
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision livestock monitoring of lactating sows: YOLOv8-based behavioral analysis under varying feeding strategies

Eddiemar B. Lagua, Ahsan Mehtab, Hong-Seok Mun, Jin-Gu Kang et al.
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Precision livestock monitoring of lactating sows: YOLOv8-based behavioral analysis under varying feeding strategies

Eddiemar B. Lagua, Ahsan Mehtab, Hong-Seok Mun, Jin-Gu Kang, Young-Hwa Kim, Chul-Ju Yang, Md Sharifuzzaman, Md Kamrul Hasan
article en

Abstract

Feeding frequency and thermal environment are key factors influencing the behavior and welfare of lactating sows, as well as piglet access to milk. This study employed a deep learning-based computer vision approach using the YOLOv8l (You Only Look Once version 8 – large) model to automate multi-class behavior detection in lactating sows. Eight distinct behaviors were classified: feeding, not feeding, suckling, not suckling, lateral lying, sternal lying, standing, and sitting. The model achieved high performance (precision = 0.943, recall = 0.950, F1-score = 0.946, mAP@50 = 0.965). Three treatment groups were evaluated: Group 1 (feeding five times/day, air-conditioned), Group 2 (hourly feeding, air-conditioned), and Group 3 (hourly feeding, non-air-conditioned). Group 2 exhibited the highest suckling frequency (38.75; <italic>p</italic> = 0.035), feeding frequency (32.97; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), and the shortest feeding interval (30.21 min; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), suggesting enhanced interaction under frequent feeding with thermal control. Group 3 showed significantly higher lateral lying frequency (27.26; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), consistent with thermoregulatory behavior in warmer environments. Postural dynamics also varied: sternal lying was highest in Group 2 (45.56; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001), while standing was more frequent in Group 2 (29.25; <italic>p</italic> < 0.001) but of shorter duration. These findings demonstrate that hourly feeding under air-conditioned conditions promotes more frequent feeding and suckling behaviors, while heat stress influences lying patterns. The YOLOv8l model proved to be a robust tool for automated behavior detection, supporting its applicability in precision livestock monitoring systems.

Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.