Identification and validation of butyrate metabolism-related biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis

Background Unlike normal colon cells with butyrate acid as the main energy source, cancerous colon cells are more inclined to use glucose. However, the mechanisms of the investigation into the modulatory role of butyrate metabolism within the pathophysiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains insufficiently explored. Methods The study analyzed four datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-COAD, TCGA-READ, GSE41258, and GSE39582) and gene sets related to butyrate metabolism-related genes (BMGs) in an integrated manner. Differentially expressed BMGs (DE-BMGs) were screened by overlapping BMGs, TCGA-DEGs between CRC and normal groups, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)-differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CRC and normal groups and were subjected to enrichment analysis. Hub genes were then screened via protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Biomarker selection was improved by applying the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Subgroup survival analyses were stratified according to different clinical phenotypes. A regulatory network modeled on competitive endogenous RNA was subsequently constructed. Finally, based on normal colon epithelial cells (NCM-460) and colon cancer cells (LOVO, HCT116, LS174T, and LS513), we detected the differential expression of biomarkers between the two groups using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) methods. Results Sixty-three DE-BMGs were obtained. Enrichment analysis showed significant correlations between DE-BMGs and signaling receptor activator activity and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-dominated pathways. Subsequently, six total biomarkers (CCND1, CXCL8, MMP3, MYC, TIMP1, and VEGFA) were obtained via PPI, LASSO, and ROC curve validation analyses. Survival analysis revealed significant differences in survival metrics between different clinical cohorts. Ingenuity pathway analysis demonstrated that pathways associated with identified biomarkers were disrupted, especially those associated with the tumor microenvironment. Finally, a computational prediction model was developed for 156 pharmacological agents targeting five key biomarkers: CCND1, CXCL8, MMP3, MYC, and VEGFA. The results of the qRT-PCR study indicated that CCND1, CXCL8, MYC, and VEGFA were upregulated in CRC cell lines, an observation consistent with existing public database records. Conclusions Six butyrate metabolism-related biomarkers (CCND1, CXCL8, MMP3, MYC, TIMP1, and VEGFA) were screened out to provide a basis for exploring the prediction of CRC diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20942
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification and validation of butyrate metabolism-related biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis

Tianhe Gu, Yan Lü, Miao Yu, Qian Chen
PeerJ
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Identification and validation of butyrate metabolism-related biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis

Tianhe Gu, Yan Lü, Miao Yu, Qian Chen
article en

Abstract

Background Unlike normal colon cells with butyrate acid as the main energy source, cancerous colon cells are more inclined to use glucose. However, the mechanisms of the investigation into the modulatory role of butyrate metabolism within the pathophysiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains insufficiently explored. Methods The study analyzed four datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-COAD, TCGA-READ, GSE41258, and GSE39582) and gene sets related to butyrate metabolism-related genes (BMGs) in an integrated manner. Differentially expressed BMGs (DE-BMGs) were screened by overlapping BMGs, TCGA-DEGs between CRC and normal groups, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)-differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CRC and normal groups and were subjected to enrichment analysis. Hub genes were then screened via protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Biomarker selection was improved by applying the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Subgroup survival analyses were stratified according to different clinical phenotypes. A regulatory network modeled on competitive endogenous RNA was subsequently constructed. Finally, based on normal colon epithelial cells (NCM-460) and colon cancer cells (LOVO, HCT116, LS174T, and LS513), we detected the differential expression of biomarkers between the two groups using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) methods. Results Sixty-three DE-BMGs were obtained. Enrichment analysis showed significant correlations between DE-BMGs and signaling receptor activator activity and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-dominated pathways. Subsequently, six total biomarkers (CCND1, CXCL8, MMP3, MYC, TIMP1, and VEGFA) were obtained via PPI, LASSO, and ROC curve validation analyses. Survival analysis revealed significant differences in survival metrics between different clinical cohorts. Ingenuity pathway analysis demonstrated that pathways associated with identified biomarkers were disrupted, especially those associated with the tumor microenvironment. Finally, a computational prediction model was developed for 156 pharmacological agents targeting five key biomarkers: CCND1, CXCL8, MMP3, MYC, and VEGFA. The results of the qRT-PCR study indicated that CCND1, CXCL8, MYC, and VEGFA were upregulated in CRC cell lines, an observation consistent with existing public database records. Conclusions Six butyrate metabolism-related biomarkers (CCND1, CXCL8, MMP3, MYC, TIMP1, and VEGFA) were screened out to provide a basis for exploring the prediction of CRC diagnosis.

PeerJVol. 14
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.