Stock Exchange ESG Disclosure Guidance and Corporate Carbon Mitigation: International Evidence

ABSTRACT This study investigates the tangible impact of the adoption of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure guidance by stock exchanges on corporate carbon mitigation, focusing on six major frameworks: the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), and the CDP. Using an international sample of large companies, results show that firms listed on exchanges with ESG guidance exhibit greater carbon mitigation, especially for Scope 1 (direct) emission mitigation. However, the mitigation effect weakens when multiple frameworks are concurrently adopted. The cross‐sectional analysis reveals that mitigation effects concentrate in voluntary disclosure settings, developing countries, low‐carbon industries, and civil law systems. Our findings underscore the importance of harmonized ESG disclosure guidance in shaping corporate environmental behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70787
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stock Exchange ESG Disclosure Guidance and Corporate Carbon Mitigation: International Evidence

Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu, Le Luo, Jiamian Yan
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Stock Exchange ESG Disclosure Guidance and Corporate Carbon Mitigation: International Evidence

Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu, Le Luo, Jiamian Yan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the tangible impact of the adoption of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure guidance by stock exchanges on corporate carbon mitigation, focusing on six major frameworks: the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), and the CDP. Using an international sample of large companies, results show that firms listed on exchanges with ESG guidance exhibit greater carbon mitigation, especially for Scope 1 (direct) emission mitigation. However, the mitigation effect weakens when multiple frameworks are concurrently adopted. The cross‐sectional analysis reveals that mitigation effects concentrate in voluntary disclosure settings, developing countries, low‐carbon industries, and civil law systems. Our findings underscore the importance of harmonized ESG disclosure guidance in shaping corporate environmental behavior.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.