Strategic Key Performance Indicators for AI in Lead Optimization

With increasing cost and failure rates in the pharmaceutical R&D process not fundamentally improving over the last decade, pressure remains high to increase the probability of success to improve the effectiveness of pharmaceutical R&D. The broad introduction of AI into the R&D landscape over the last years holds the promise to lift pharmaceutical R&D out of its productivity problem, as preliminary analyses suggest that "AI-native" companies may be outpacing traditional peers. However, harnessing this potential requires moving beyond measuring technical model performance (e.g., predictive accuracy) to measuring strategic impact. In this perspective, members of the EFMC<sup>2</sup> community-focused on advancing the collaboration between computational and medicinal chemists-discuss the challenges of applying key performance indicators (KPIs) in the idiosyncratic environment of drug discovery. We argue that the shift from expert-driven computer-aided drug design (CADD) to semiautonomous AI necessitates a new framework of impact-oriented KPIs. We provide recommendations for designing these strategic indicators to drive adoption, foster innovation, and objectively assess whether digital tools are delivering top-line impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemMedChem
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202501089
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Key Performance Indicators for AI in Lead Optimization

Stefanie Flohr, Franz von Nussbaum, Mireille Krier, Ewa I. Chudyk et al.
ChemMedChem
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Strategic Key Performance Indicators for AI in Lead Optimization

Stefanie Flohr, Franz von Nussbaum, Mireille Krier, Ewa I. Chudyk, Werngard Czechtizky, Theodor Theis, Hayley Binch, Markus Klein
article en

Abstract

With increasing cost and failure rates in the pharmaceutical R&D process not fundamentally improving over the last decade, pressure remains high to increase the probability of success to improve the effectiveness of pharmaceutical R&D. The broad introduction of AI into the R&D landscape over the last years holds the promise to lift pharmaceutical R&D out of its productivity problem, as preliminary analyses suggest that "AI-native" companies may be outpacing traditional peers. However, harnessing this potential requires moving beyond measuring technical model performance (e.g., predictive accuracy) to measuring strategic impact. In this perspective, members of the EFMC<sup>2</sup> community-focused on advancing the collaboration between computational and medicinal chemists-discuss the challenges of applying key performance indicators (KPIs) in the idiosyncratic environment of drug discovery. We argue that the shift from expert-driven computer-aided drug design (CADD) to semiautonomous AI necessitates a new framework of impact-oriented KPIs. We provide recommendations for designing these strategic indicators to drive adoption, foster innovation, and objectively assess whether digital tools are delivering top-line impact.

ChemMedChemVol. 21(6)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE), Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany) (DE), AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE), Nuvisan (Germany) (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.