The TRUE PROMISE of Peace: From Mutual Destruction to Mutual Preservation

Modern conflict has long been governed by the logic of deterrence through fear—most notably embodied in the doctrine of mutual destruction. While such frameworks have prevented large-scale wars, they have simultaneously entrenched a system in which violence remains the default language of power. This paper proposes a fundamental shift: from mutual destruction to mutual preservation. It argues that sustainable peace emerges not from the threat of retaliation, but from the alignment of incentives such that no actor benefits from initiating harm. The framework emphasizes early negotiation, accountability for violence, and ethical constraints rooted in enduring civilizational principles. Drawing from both systemic analysis (OODA–C3 dynamics) and comparative religious ethics, this work outlines a new paradigm of deterrence—one that preserves systems rather than threatens their collapse.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19177913
Primary Topic
Peace and Human Rights Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The TRUE PROMISE of Peace: From Mutual Destruction to Mutual Preservation

Essentia Vera
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace and Human Rights Education
article

The TRUE PROMISE of Peace: From Mutual Destruction to Mutual Preservation

Essentia Vera
article en

Abstract

Modern conflict has long been governed by the logic of deterrence through fear—most notably embodied in the doctrine of mutual destruction. While such frameworks have prevented large-scale wars, they have simultaneously entrenched a system in which violence remains the default language of power. This paper proposes a fundamental shift: from mutual destruction to mutual preservation. It argues that sustainable peace emerges not from the threat of retaliation, but from the alignment of incentives such that no actor benefits from initiating harm. The framework emphasizes early negotiation, accountability for violence, and ethical constraints rooted in enduring civilizational principles. Drawing from both systemic analysis (OODA–C3 dynamics) and comparative religious ethics, this work outlines a new paradigm of deterrence—one that preserves systems rather than threatens their collapse.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Peace and Human Rights Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.