Machine learning and response surface analysis of mean drop size and dispersed phase holdup in an L-shaped pulsed sieve plate column

This study explores the hydrodynamic behavior of four distinct nitric acid-TBP/kerosene systems in an L-shaped pulsed sieve-plate column (LPSPC), with a focus on predicting Sauter mean drop diameter (SMDD) and dispersed phase holdup (DPH). The complex interactions between operating parameters, pulsation intensity, flow rate, and hydrodynamic performance were modeled using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN). This is the first side-by-side assessment of ANN versus RSM for LPSPC. The model was trained on experimental dataset, with 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing, respectively. A compact two-hidden-layer topology with 10 and 5 neurons with trainbr was selected after a systematic search over 1–4 layers and three training algorithms. The ANN model achieved R2 values of 0.9950, 0.9970, 0.9900, and 0.9822 with MSE values of 0.000314, 0.000451, 0.000019, and 0.000001 for SMDD-horizontal, SMDD-vertical, DPH-horizontal, and DPH-vertical, respectively. At the same time, RSM was slightly better for SMDD-vertical. Complementing these data-driven models, new dimensionless semi-empirical correlations derived via Buckingham’s π-theorem agreed well with experiments, yielding AAREs of 6.95% and 8.29% for SMDD, and 6.56% and 8.68% for DPH in horizontal. Together, these tools provide accurate and usable surrogates for analyzing and optimizing extraction systems relevant to the purification of yellow cake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40081-w
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning and response surface analysis of mean drop size and dispersed phase holdup in an L-shaped pulsed sieve plate column

Fatemeh Ardestani, َAhad Ghaemi, Fatemeh Bahmanzadegan
Scientific Reports
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Machine learning and response surface analysis of mean drop size and dispersed phase holdup in an L-shaped pulsed sieve plate column

Fatemeh Ardestani, َAhad Ghaemi, Fatemeh Bahmanzadegan
article en

Abstract

This study explores the hydrodynamic behavior of four distinct nitric acid-TBP/kerosene systems in an L-shaped pulsed sieve-plate column (LPSPC), with a focus on predicting Sauter mean drop diameter (SMDD) and dispersed phase holdup (DPH). The complex interactions between operating parameters, pulsation intensity, flow rate, and hydrodynamic performance were modeled using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN). This is the first side-by-side assessment of ANN versus RSM for LPSPC. The model was trained on experimental dataset, with 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing, respectively. A compact two-hidden-layer topology with 10 and 5 neurons with trainbr was selected after a systematic search over 1–4 layers and three training algorithms. The ANN model achieved R2 values of 0.9950, 0.9970, 0.9900, and 0.9822 with MSE values of 0.000314, 0.000451, 0.000019, and 0.000001 for SMDD-horizontal, SMDD-vertical, DPH-horizontal, and DPH-vertical, respectively. At the same time, RSM was slightly better for SMDD-vertical. Complementing these data-driven models, new dimensionless semi-empirical correlations derived via Buckingham’s π-theorem agreed well with experiments, yielding AAREs of 6.95% and 8.29% for SMDD, and 6.56% and 8.68% for DPH in horizontal. Together, these tools provide accurate and usable surrogates for analyzing and optimizing extraction systems relevant to the purification of yellow cake.

Scientific Reports
Petroleum University of Technology (IR), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.